2010
DOI: 10.1175/2010bams3030.1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Influence of Choice of Time Period on Global Surface Temperature Trend Estimates

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

8
92
0
2

Year Published

2012
2012
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 110 publications
(102 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
8
92
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…The relatively small standard deviation values and higher R 2 are indicative of the lower interannual variability in the temperature compared to the rainfall values. These linear rising trends are in general agreement with the results reported by Rehman (2010) and Narsallah and Balling (1996), given the statistical uncertainty caused by the available time period for which the data are analysed (Liebmann et al, 2010). Figure 11 displays the spatial distributions for the mean annual temperatures in 1982 and 1999, which are the lowest and highest mean annual temperature years, respectively, during the period 1978-2009 (see Figure 10).…”
Section: Temperature Trendssupporting
confidence: 87%
“…The relatively small standard deviation values and higher R 2 are indicative of the lower interannual variability in the temperature compared to the rainfall values. These linear rising trends are in general agreement with the results reported by Rehman (2010) and Narsallah and Balling (1996), given the statistical uncertainty caused by the available time period for which the data are analysed (Liebmann et al, 2010). Figure 11 displays the spatial distributions for the mean annual temperatures in 1982 and 1999, which are the lowest and highest mean annual temperature years, respectively, during the period 1978-2009 (see Figure 10).…”
Section: Temperature Trendssupporting
confidence: 87%
“…Observational estimates starting from 1999 occur toward the lower half of both simulated ensembles, coinciding with the observed hiatus in global surface warming [Knight et al, 2010;Wang et al, 2010;Liebmann et al, 2010;Flato et al, 2013], although observed TTTs continue to rise during this period. The year 2009 stands out in that it is the only estimate occurring outside the CMIP5 ensemble for all observational estimates except for the newest-developed IUKv2 .…”
Section: Internal Variability In Tropical Tropospheric Temperaturesmentioning
confidence: 59%
“…ORA-S3 and ORA-S4 are limited by the availability of the necessary monthly averaged fields for analysis of the ocean mixed layer heat budget (see below). The linear trend is chosen despite the presence of hiatus periods in the global warming record since these are not statistically significant (Liebmann et al 2010), and to minimize the influence of modes of natural variability on interannual to decadal time scales. The evaluation of statistical significance includes an accounting of autocorrelation using the Zwiers and von Storch (1995) two-stage table lookup test procedure.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%