The platform will undergo maintenance on Sep 14 at about 7:45 AM EST and will be unavailable for approximately 2 hours.
2018
DOI: 10.1111/1747-0080.12414
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Influence of chemoradiotherapy on nutritional status, functional capacity, quality of life and toxicity of treatment for patients with cervical cancer

Abstract: Chemoradiotherapy treatment in patients with cervical cancer had changed negative nutritional parameters, function capacity and QoL, and poor nutritional status at baseline was associated with chemotherapy interruption.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

1
29
0
1

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 33 publications
(32 citation statements)
references
References 40 publications
1
29
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Next, there was a significant difference in patients' HGS between subgroups based on KPS scores. Patients with a poorer PS had significantly lower HGS measurements compared to patients with a higher PS, a trend noted in other studies as well [55,[60][61][62]. PS is an important indicator of a patient's ability to be functional and perform activities of daily living.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 54%
“…Next, there was a significant difference in patients' HGS between subgroups based on KPS scores. Patients with a poorer PS had significantly lower HGS measurements compared to patients with a higher PS, a trend noted in other studies as well [55,[60][61][62]. PS is an important indicator of a patient's ability to be functional and perform activities of daily living.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 54%
“…In Fig. 3b, we can observe that after treatment the patient population moves to the bottom left, the median for all indices are significantly reduced, BMI is 25 (16)(17)(18)(19)(20)(21)(22)(23)(24)(25)(26)(27)(28)(29)(30)(31)(32)(33)(34), SMI is 37.9 (18.3-52.6), SATI 72.2 (6.6-167.9) and VATI 32.3 (3.8-69.9). After treatment, 58.3% patients develop sarcopenia; some of these patients who develop sarcopenia are obese according to a BMI ≥30 and also present high visceral and subcutaneous adiposity.…”
Section: Decline Of the Nutritional Status Of Locally Advanced Cervicmentioning
confidence: 89%
“…Actually, the proportion of patients received the surgery treatments were corresponding to cases' 3-year CSS rates variation in different states. With postoperative adjuvant therapy 30 , laparoscopic radical surgery and robot-assisted surgery widely applying for the cervical cancer surgery treatment [31][32][33] , the higher 3-CSS rates for the cases with well or moderate differentiation tumor demonstrated in these economic advanced states. In some areas, African Americans were the majority of the patients who were less likely to receive surgical treatment 34 , and showed worse survival in the long trend.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Because of the higher level of economic condition and more complete healthcare environment construction in California, Connecticut and Washington, patients there would have more strategies for conservative treatment, comparing with patients in Michigan and New Mexico. Although patients with poorly differentiation tumor or in late stages only took up a small proportion in all registered cases, most of these patients generally lost chances for surgery, so chemoradiotherapy 32,34,35 became a vital treatment method for them, which draw more attention by the government in U.S. Unfortunately, in many low and middle-income states, radiation therapy capacity is severely limited 36 , leading to the worse prognosis in Michigan and New Mexico.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%