2013
DOI: 10.1186/2193-1801-2-342
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Influence of cheek support on respiratory impedance measured by forced oscillation technique

Abstract: The forced oscillation technique (FOT) is a useful tool to assess respiratory resistance and reactance during tidal breathing in patients with respiratory diseases, specifically asthma and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Although the FOT has been clinically used, results of respiratory impedance can be affected by various factors such as upper airway artifact. We investigated the effects of cheek support on respiratory resistance and reactance measured by a commercially available FOT equipment MostGraph… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
15
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
1
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Cheek support by an operator, not the subject himself/herself, was found to result in different impedance values (lower Rrs and smaller Xrs) in patients with respiratory diseases, but not in healthy controls (10). The subjects are instructed to breathe quietly at a functional residual capacity level (tidal breathing) for approximately 30 seconds.…”
Section: Measurementsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Cheek support by an operator, not the subject himself/herself, was found to result in different impedance values (lower Rrs and smaller Xrs) in patients with respiratory diseases, but not in healthy controls (10). The subjects are instructed to breathe quietly at a functional residual capacity level (tidal breathing) for approximately 30 seconds.…”
Section: Measurementsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is therefore important to properly hold the cheeks during the test so that they do not vibrate. Inaccurate cheek holding results in a significant lowering of the resistance value in patients with obstructive and interstitial diseases, with only a small effect on the measured values in healthy people [47].…”
Section: Limitations Of the Fot Methodsmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…The poor cheek support is a common artefact during FOT measurement. Pressure oscillations are applied at the mouth and the impedance of extra-thoracic airway walls, including the cheek, tongue, mouthpiece and upper airway affect the results of measurements [14,47]. If the cheeks are not held properly, resistance values reduce significantly (Rrs is therefore underestimated) [47].…”
Section: Limitations Of the Fot Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In order to validate the prototype FOT device, experimentally tested the device with 10 healthy adult volunteers, including 5 male and 5 female, respectively, with average height of 166 cm, average weight of 65kg and average age of 31.2y. The volunteer was tested at sit-up straight and resting state [10]. Figure 5 shows the waveforms of pressure and flow signals as measured by the pressure and flow sensors.…”
Section: The Experimental Testing Of the Fot Devicementioning
confidence: 99%