“…), low electronegativity, viable resources, less cost, and so on . , Typically, the comparison of dimensionality with 0-dimensional (0D), 1-dimensional (1D), 2-dimensional (2D), and 3-dimensional (3D) nano-/microarchitectures offered a vast opening to the exploration of their promising new properties. Especially, 3D urchin-like, grass-like, sea-like, octopus-like, and flower-like nanostructures assembled by 0D, 1D, or 2D nanostructures are of high interest in electrode materials for SCs compared to simple nanostructured sulfide materials due to their unique porous features, high surface area, and good ionic/electron transport. − So far, the 3D-Bi 2 S 3 hierarchical architectures were widely designed and synthesized carefully.…”