2021
DOI: 10.1097/gox.0000000000003409
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Influence of BMI, Age, and Gender on the Thickness of Most Common Thinned Flaps

Abstract: Background: Since the description of superficial fascia flap harvesting, a new window of opportunity has been open in obese patients, where a higher subcutaneous thickness of tissue is present. To our knowledge, the impact of body mass index on superficial fascial flaps has not been reported. Methods: We recruited 122 patients from April 2019 to January 2020. From these patients, the 3 most common thinned flaps were selected: the superficial circumflex iliac perforator … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Although the anatomical variability of the SCIP has been much overcome, flap thickness is dependent on patient gender and BMI. Because superficial fat layer is less influenced by these factors (Hanson‐Viana et al, 2021), flap elevation requires a suprafascial approach demanding surgical dexterity. Suprafascial ALT free flap is another thin workhorse flap but is difficult to harvest with a relatively long and large pedicle.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Although the anatomical variability of the SCIP has been much overcome, flap thickness is dependent on patient gender and BMI. Because superficial fat layer is less influenced by these factors (Hanson‐Viana et al, 2021), flap elevation requires a suprafascial approach demanding surgical dexterity. Suprafascial ALT free flap is another thin workhorse flap but is difficult to harvest with a relatively long and large pedicle.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There are varying reports on maximum flap width for donor site closure without skin graft. Traction range is affected by skin thickness and elasticity, which vary by individual characteristics such as gender (Firooz et al, 2017; Hanson‐Viana et al, 2021) or BMI (Hanson‐Viana et al, 2021; Iacopi et al, 2020). While we have seen donor sites of up to 6 cm be closed without complications, skin thickness varies by patients and relevant factors must be taken into account in designing and repairing donor sites.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…To that end, we describe the use of the superficial circumflex iliac artery perforator (SCIP) flap, which provides a thin, pliable flap with a reliable vascular pedicle, large donor site, and excellent cosmesis of the donor site with minimal morbidity. This flap was initially described in 2004 by Koshima et al 9,10 Given the lack of adiposity in the SCIP as compared with the ALT in a progressively heavier American population, 11 we find it a more appropriate option for hand and upper extremity coverage. In this report, we present the first series on the SCIP flap for upper extremity blast injury coverage in North America.…”
mentioning
confidence: 93%