2019
DOI: 10.17973/mmsj.2019_03_2018127
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Influence of Basic Process Parameters on Mechanical and Internal Properties of 316l Steel in SLM Process for Renishaw Am400

Abstract: The paper deals with the study and experimental evaluation of the influence of process parameters determining the resulting mechanical properties of the components after additive production using the 1.4404 (316L) stainless steel SLM method. The determining process parameters that have been investigated are laser power, scanning speed and layer creation strategy. These parameters fundamentally affect the microstructure and macrostructure of components created by the SLM method, therefore, they have been subjec… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
15
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

3
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The aim of the article is to better understand what happens during TIG welding of two materials printed by the SLM method. At present, there are already many articles focused on the optimization of process parameters [ 10 , 11 , 12 ], microstructure [ 13 , 14 , 15 , 16 ] and surface roughness [ 17 , 18 , 19 , 20 , 21 , 22 ] of AISI (American Iron and Steel Institute) 316L material after printing by SLM. However, there are still only few studies [ 23 , 24 ] dealing with the weldability of this material.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The aim of the article is to better understand what happens during TIG welding of two materials printed by the SLM method. At present, there are already many articles focused on the optimization of process parameters [ 10 , 11 , 12 ], microstructure [ 13 , 14 , 15 , 16 ] and surface roughness [ 17 , 18 , 19 , 20 , 21 , 22 ] of AISI (American Iron and Steel Institute) 316L material after printing by SLM. However, there are still only few studies [ 23 , 24 ] dealing with the weldability of this material.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The porosity varied with various parameters, such as the number of layers laid and the printing time. The study [19] dealt with the optimization of those parameters, and the production parameters from this study were used to produce the specimens in our study. These production parameters guaranteed a porosity of more than 99.9%.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These production parameters guaranteed a porosity of more than 99.9%. Other 3D printing parameters are shown in Table 1 [19,20] (QuantAM, SW made by company Renishaw) [21]. Building time was 76 h. The part orientation and the position in the chamber, the 3D printing preview, and the chessboard strategy preview in the cross-section are presented in Figure 1.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The generated shape transfers the pressure load onto fixed supports. The model needs to be smoothed in order to obtain a continual surface mesh for the best manufacturability and end usability in a real-world scenario [15][16][17]. be smoothed in order to obtain a continual surface mesh for the best manufacturability and end usability in a real-world scenario [15][16][17].…”
Section: Principle Of Topology Optimizationmentioning
confidence: 99%