1986
DOI: 10.1111/j.1439-0418.1986.tb00872.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Influence of bait formulations on the effectiveness of Bacillus thuringiensis against Spodoptera littoralis (Boisd.) (Lep., Noctuidae)

Abstract: Cycle biologlque et rcpurtition de M. wachtli dans le Rasstn MPditerranGen 381h.l,w, L., 1944: Nuovi reperti di Chalcidi nella Liguria (Hymen. paras.) Mem. SOC. Entomol. ROQUES, A.; FABRE, J. P.; RAIMBAULT, J. P.; DELPLANQUE, A,; GARCIA, J.; GOUSSARD, F., 1983: Les insectes ravageurs des cBnes et graines de coniftres en France. Versailles: I.N.R.A. SErrNER, M., 1916: Uber Nadelholzsamen zerstorende Chalcidien. Centralbl. ges. Forstwes. TEMPLADO, J., 1976: Una plaga de las cupressaceas: Pseudococcyx tessulatana… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
3
0
1

Year Published

1993
1993
2009
2009

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
(7 reference statements)
1
3
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Also IGRs may act as growth distruptor, it interferes with moulting by softening the larval endocuticle through reduction in its chitin content and by hardening of the exocuticle as result of enhanced phenoloxidase activity. These results are in agreement with many investigators, Dulmage, 1971;Ibrahim, 1974;Ascher and Nemny, 1979;Dimetry, et al, 1979;Grosscurt and Anderson, 1980;Radwan, et al, 1980;El-Sayed, 1981;El-Nockrashy, et al, 1986;Lecadet and Martouret, 1987;Marguerre-M and Daniel, 1987;Chilcott and Ellar, 1988;Chung and Cote, 1992;Fisk and Wright, 1992;Tabashnik, 1992;Chandler, 1993;Palma and Meola, 1993;Forrester, 1994;El-Kordy, et al, 1995;Pawar, et al, 1995;Smagghe, et al, 1997;Barker, 1998;Said, 1998 In general, the susceptibility of Spodoptera larvae to Dipel-2X increases when treatment after IGRs. The IGRs+Dipel-2X caused more toxic effect than single treatment with Dipel-2X, it could be concluded that IGRs enhanced the toxicity effect of Dipel-2X.…”
Section: Results and Discussion Toxicity Of Dipel-2x And Three Igrssupporting
confidence: 82%
“…Also IGRs may act as growth distruptor, it interferes with moulting by softening the larval endocuticle through reduction in its chitin content and by hardening of the exocuticle as result of enhanced phenoloxidase activity. These results are in agreement with many investigators, Dulmage, 1971;Ibrahim, 1974;Ascher and Nemny, 1979;Dimetry, et al, 1979;Grosscurt and Anderson, 1980;Radwan, et al, 1980;El-Sayed, 1981;El-Nockrashy, et al, 1986;Lecadet and Martouret, 1987;Marguerre-M and Daniel, 1987;Chilcott and Ellar, 1988;Chung and Cote, 1992;Fisk and Wright, 1992;Tabashnik, 1992;Chandler, 1993;Palma and Meola, 1993;Forrester, 1994;El-Kordy, et al, 1995;Pawar, et al, 1995;Smagghe, et al, 1997;Barker, 1998;Said, 1998 In general, the susceptibility of Spodoptera larvae to Dipel-2X increases when treatment after IGRs. The IGRs+Dipel-2X caused more toxic effect than single treatment with Dipel-2X, it could be concluded that IGRs enhanced the toxicity effect of Dipel-2X.…”
Section: Results and Discussion Toxicity Of Dipel-2x And Three Igrssupporting
confidence: 82%
“…were successfully implemented against Spodoptera littoralis (Boisd.) (9). More recently, promising results on enhancement of B.t.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…'References: I, Allen and Pate (1966); 2, Bartelt et al (1990); 3, Bell and Kanavel (1975); 4, Bell and Kanavel (1978); 5, El-Nockrashy et al (1986); 6, Guerra and Shaver (1969); 7, Gholson and Showers (1979); 8, Mclaughlin et al (1971); 9, Montoya et al (1966); 10, Navon et al (1987); 11, Patti and Carner (1974); 12, Potter and Watson (l983b); 13, Smith et al (1982); 14, Starks et al (1965). The possibility of feeding stimulants for other economically important lepidopterous larva was investigated by EI-Nockrashy et al (1986) on Spodoptera littoralis, the cotton leafworm. They evaluated various solvent extracts of cottonseed flour, nontreated soy flour, crude and refined cottonseed oil, ethanol extracts of cottonseed kernels, the sugar raffinose, and a hot water extract of dried com kernels.…”
Section: Status Of Available Feeding Stimulantsmentioning
confidence: 99%