Influence of Attributed Expertness and Gender in Counselor Supervision

Schiavone, Carol D.; Jessell, John C.

doi:10.1002/j.1556-6978.1988.tb00785.x

Cited by 13 publications

(15 citation statements)

References 25 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Furthermore, socially and culturally defined gender roles and expectations are brought into supervision (Ancis & Ladany, 2010;Brodsky, 1980;Holloway & Wolleat, 1994;Inman & Ladany, in press;Munson, 1997;Stevens-Smith, 1995). Several authors have described theoretical models (Munson, 1997;Nelson, 1997) or have made recommendations regarding gender issues in supervision (Ancis & Ladany, 2010;Bernstein, 1993;Brodsky, 1980;Nadelson, Belitsky, Seeman, & Ablow, 1994;Stevens-Smith, 1995;Twohey & Volker, 1993); however, only a few have examined gender issues empirically (Baker, 1991;Budd, 1994;Claridge, 1994;Gullotta-Gsell, 1984;Horwitz, 1990;Johnson, 1997;Nelson & Holloway, 1990;Robyak, Goodyear, & Prange, 1987;Schiavone & Jessell, 1988;Schwartz, 1994;Walker, Ladany, & Pate-Carolan, 2007;Worthington & Stern, 1985). These studies are extremely varied in design and focus, and perhaps as a result, their findings are inconsistent and inconclusive (Holloway & Wolleat, 1994;Munson, 1997).…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

The relationship of supervisor and trainee gender match and gender attitude match to supervisory style and the supervisory working alliance

Rarick

Ladany

2013

Couns and Psychother Res

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Background: Gender‐related events have the potential to impact the supervisory relationship. Gender events might be related to the match between supervisors and supervisees on variables such as gender or gender attitudes. Method: In this study, we sought to determine whether gender match and gender attitude match were related to supervisory style and the supervisory working alliance in 94 supervisory dyads using four instruments: the Gender Attitude Inventory; Operationalisation of Gender Match; Supervisory Styles Inventory; and the Working Alliance Inventory/Supervision. Results: Progressive dyads (in which supervisors have more liberal attitudes about societal issues and culturally defined roles for women than their supervisees) were perceived by supervisors as more task‐oriented than parallel‐high dyads (in which supervisors and supervisees both had liberal attitudes). Implications for counselling supervision are discussed.

show abstract

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

The relationship of supervisor and trainee gender match and gender attitude match to supervisory style and the supervisory working alliance

Rarick

Ladany

2013

Couns and Psychother Res

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Each one of these aspects of the supervisory relationship has a demonstrated relationship to supervision outcome (Borders & Fong, 1991;Heppner & Handley, 1981;Ladany & Friedlander, 1995;Schacht, Howe, & Berman, 1988;Schiavone & Jessell, 1988), and each has specific implications for supervision in substance abuse counseling.…”

mentioning

confidence: 97%

Perceptions of the Supervisory Relationship: Recovering and Nonrecovering Substance Abuse Counselors

Culbreth

Borders

1999

Jour of Counseling & Develop

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The unique set of dynamics found in the substance abuse field (i.e., recovering and nonrecovering counselors and supervisors) calls for a separate examination of the supervisory relationship within this context. The authors examined differences in counselors' perceptions of the supervisory relationship based on counselor and supervisor recovery status, and the match or mismatch of counselor and supervisor recovery status. Substance abuse counselors (N = 547) working in a statewide public mental health system located in the Southeast rated satisfaction with supervision and reported perceptions of various dimensions of the supervisory relationship. Results of the 2 (counselor recovery status: nonrecovering and recovering) H 2 (supervisor recovery status: nonrecovering and recovering) multivariate analysis of variance indicated no significant differences in ratings of satisfaction or relationship dimensions based on either the counselors' or supervisors' recovery status. A significant interaction effect for counselor and supervisor recovery status (i.e., match or mismatch of recovery status) was found for all satisfaction and relationship measures.

show abstract

“…The resulting coefficients were Expertness at. 90, Attractiveness at .91, and Trustworthiness at .87 (Schiavone & Jessell, 1988).…”

Section: Instrumentsmentioning

confidence: 98%

“…The Supervisor Rating Form-Short version (SRF-S; Schiavone & Jessell, 1988) is a 12-item Likert scale instrument designed to rate supervisees' perceptions of supervisors on the social influence dimensions of Expertness, Attractiveness, and Trustworthiness (S. R. Strong, 1968). Respondents used, in a 7-point format, the words not very and very as the anchors to rate their supervisor on each of the 12 items.…”

Section: Instrumentsmentioning

confidence: 99%

The Impact of Metaphor on Clinical Hypothesis Formation and Perceived Supervisor Characteristics

Young

Borders²

1998

Couns Edu & Supervision

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

Influence of Attributed Expertness and Gender in Counselor Supervision

Abstract: Counselor trainee ratings of supervisor expertness and competence did not differ as a function of either supervisor or trainee gender, but higher level ascribed expertness and competence were more favorably rated.

Cited by 13 publications

References 25 publications

The relationship of supervisor and trainee gender match and gender attitude match to supervisory style and the supervisory working alliance

The relationship of supervisor and trainee gender match and gender attitude match to supervisory style and the supervisory working alliance

Perceptions of the Supervisory Relationship: Recovering and Nonrecovering Substance Abuse Counselors

The Impact of Metaphor on Clinical Hypothesis Formation and Perceived Supervisor Characteristics

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About