1983
DOI: 10.1016/0022-0248(83)90282-8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Influence of annealing during growth on defect formation in Czochralski silicon

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

2
9
0

Year Published

1985
1985
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
2
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The relative absence of detectable defects in approximately 10 -7 cm ~ of Quench material after the 1050~ treatment is consistent with the observation by Nakanishi et al (6) that densities after such annealing in Quench material can be down from those in Ramp/Shield material by several orders of magnitude. The relative absence of detectable defects in approximately 10 -7 cm ~ of Quench material after the 1050~ treatment is consistent with the observation by Nakanishi et al (6) that densities after such annealing in Quench material can be down from those in Ramp/Shield material by several orders of magnitude.…”
Section: Fig 2 O: Defects In Ramp Crystals After 775~ Wafer Heattresupporting
confidence: 90%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The relative absence of detectable defects in approximately 10 -7 cm ~ of Quench material after the 1050~ treatment is consistent with the observation by Nakanishi et al (6) that densities after such annealing in Quench material can be down from those in Ramp/Shield material by several orders of magnitude. The relative absence of detectable defects in approximately 10 -7 cm ~ of Quench material after the 1050~ treatment is consistent with the observation by Nakanishi et al (6) that densities after such annealing in Quench material can be down from those in Ramp/Shield material by several orders of magnitude.…”
Section: Fig 2 O: Defects In Ramp Crystals After 775~ Wafer Heattresupporting
confidence: 90%
“…Independently, Nakanishi et al (6) have demonstrated that defect density after a 1050~ wafer heat-treatment can be decreased, and the defect radial distribution modified, by rapid cooling of a 3 in. diam ingot after crystallization.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The investigated 750 mm‐long ingot was pulled with a relatively slow speed of 36 mm h −1 , leading to a cooling rate of about 100 K h −1 at temperatures above 1300 °C. [ 20 ] However, in current Cz‐Si manufacturing (especially for photovoltaics) the pulling rate is much higher (≥60 mm h −1 ), [ 18,21 ] leading to high cooling rates (≫100 K h −1 ) at high temperatures where the temperature–time profile flattens out as room temperature is approached. [ 20,21 ] Nielsen et al [ 5 ] recently even introduced active cooling near the melt/crystal interface in industrial ingot manufacturing to increase throughput.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[12] The seed end will stay in the cold zone of the Cz-Si pulling process for a prolonged time, and the thermal history will thereby vary as a function of crystal height with deviations in impurity distribution. A study by Nakanishi et al [13] showed that if different cooling profiles are used for two crystals, the fastest cooling crystal will have less supersaturated oxygen precipitates after 12 h heat treatment. When the crystal grows and solidifies, the oxygen out-diffuses and there is a drastic decrease in oxygen concentration in Cz material near the periphery region.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%