2010
DOI: 10.1093/bja/aeq330
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Influence of ambient light on cerebral oximeters

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
14
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 2 publications
0
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The proportion of pre-hospital time with successful monitoring (>70%) was 71.4% (45 of 63) for all three sensors, with at least two sensors functional in 90.4% (57 of 63). The median (interquartile range) scene time was 19 (11)(12)(13)(14)(15)(16)(17)(18)(19)(20)(21)(22)(23) minutes in patients with NIRS monitoring compared to 18 (11)(12)(13)(14)(15)(16)(17)(18)(19)(20)(21)(22)(23)(24)(25)(26)(27) minutes without NIRS monitoring (P = .570). There was no difference in the median (interquartile range) total pre-hospital time between patients with or without monitoring sensors (72 [59-89] versus 72 [59-80] minutes; P = .605).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 98%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The proportion of pre-hospital time with successful monitoring (>70%) was 71.4% (45 of 63) for all three sensors, with at least two sensors functional in 90.4% (57 of 63). The median (interquartile range) scene time was 19 (11)(12)(13)(14)(15)(16)(17)(18)(19)(20)(21)(22)(23) minutes in patients with NIRS monitoring compared to 18 (11)(12)(13)(14)(15)(16)(17)(18)(19)(20)(21)(22)(23)(24)(25)(26)(27) minutes without NIRS monitoring (P = .570). There was no difference in the median (interquartile range) total pre-hospital time between patients with or without monitoring sensors (72 [59-89] versus 72 [59-80] minutes; P = .605).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…For time spent at the scene, there was no difference between the three patient groups (Table 1); patients with or without NIRS monitoring also had similar scene times (P = .570). In the sensitivity analysis, the median (IQR) scene time for those with sensors applied who met the inclusion criteria (n = 53) was 19 (13)(14)(15)(16)(17)(18)(19)(20)(21)(22)(23) with no difference between patients with and without NIRS monitoring (P = .867). For total pre-hospital time, there was no difference between the three patient groups (Table 1); patients with or without NIRS monitoring also had similar total pre-hospital time (P = .605).…”
Section: Re Sultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…26 An advantage of tissue oximeters that give absolute values rather than monitoring relative change is that there is no need for baseline calibration. 27 NIRS manufacturers apply empirical calibration coefficients based upon clinical and optical phantom data. NIRS tissue oxygen saturation values are then related to the calibration reference as determined from the weighted venous and arterial oxygen saturations (75∕25 for INVOS and 70∕30 for FORE-SIGHT).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Relative oximeters emit two (730 and 810 nm, INVOS) or three (730, 810, and 880 nm, NONIN) wavelengths of LED. Zouter and Arbeid [8] found that absolute oximetry was not influenced by ambient light but relative oximetry is. Based on personal out-of-hospital clinical experience absolute oximetry (FORE-SIGHT) is also influenced by ambient light and the sensors need to be covered.…”
Section: Near-infrared Spectroscopymentioning
confidence: 98%