2013
DOI: 10.1117/1.jbo.18.8.087006
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison of cerebral tissue oxygenation values in full term and preterm newborns by the simultaneous use of two near-infrared spectroscopy devices: an absolute and a relative trending oximeter

Abstract: The aim of this study is to compare a two-wavelength light emitting diode-based tissue oximeter (INVOS), which is designed to show trends in tissue oxygenation, with a four-wavelength laser-based oximeter (FORE-SIGHT), designed to deliver absolute values of tissue oxygenation. Simultaneous values of cerebral tissue oxygenation (StO2) are measured using both devices in 15 term and 15 preterm clinically stable newborns on the first and third day of life. Values are recorded simultaneously in two periods between … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The difference between precision levels of the devices was argued to be caused by the differences between measurement algorithms, laser technology, and penetration of light at different wavelengths, sensitivity of the detectors, and interference between the devices that were used simultaneously. Szczapa et al [25] conclude that performance of the two devices is probably acceptable for clinical purposes. Both performed sufficiently well, but the use of FORESIGHT may be associated with tighter range and better repeatability of data.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…The difference between precision levels of the devices was argued to be caused by the differences between measurement algorithms, laser technology, and penetration of light at different wavelengths, sensitivity of the detectors, and interference between the devices that were used simultaneously. Szczapa et al [25] conclude that performance of the two devices is probably acceptable for clinical purposes. Both performed sufficiently well, but the use of FORESIGHT may be associated with tighter range and better repeatability of data.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Since there is no simple test so far and the specific StO 2 value depends on several assumptions, it is not surprising that oximeters from different manufacturers provide different StO 2 values as established by numerous studies [7,[11][12][13][14][15][16][17][18]. With the lack of a standard, the need arose to translate between different oximeters within and between trials (e.g.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…36,39,40 Third, even devices that agree within the normal range may deviate significantly in the hypoxic range as shown in infants born at term. 41 This is most important, since it is in the hypoxic range that values may-or may not-lead to change in clinical care.…”
Section: Agreementmentioning
confidence: 99%