2006
DOI: 10.1016/j.cattod.2005.11.077
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Influence of absorption on quantitative analysis in Raman spectroscopy

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
45
0
2

Year Published

2006
2006
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 39 publications
(47 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
0
45
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…As it considers only the absolute intensity of a given band, this method minimises the matrix effect, but it is potentially affected by focusing errors, surface microtopography (Behrens et al, 2006;Di Muro et al, 2006a;Mercier et al, 2009) and the medium self-absorption (Wu et al, 2006).…”
Section: Calibration Proceduresmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As it considers only the absolute intensity of a given band, this method minimises the matrix effect, but it is potentially affected by focusing errors, surface microtopography (Behrens et al, 2006;Di Muro et al, 2006a;Mercier et al, 2009) and the medium self-absorption (Wu et al, 2006).…”
Section: Calibration Proceduresmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several reviews of recent publications are available [31,114]. It has been shown that corrections can be made using the Kubelka-Munk formalism [116][117][118][119]. It may occur that a working catalyst changes color under reaction conditions (e.g.…”
Section: G Characterization Of Catalysts Under Working Conditionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…1 shows a correlation between the observed Raman intensity and the amount of Cr 61 in the catalyst in the range 0-1.5 wt% and suggests that the amount of Cr 61 can be monitored quantitatively by using in situ Raman spectroscopy. Recently, a similar calibration line for low-loaded supported vanadium oxide catalysts has been presented by Wu et al 11 From a practical point of view, however, it would be advantageous if no internal standard has to be added for Raman quantification. Thus, in line with the previous work, the diffuse reflectance measured at 562 nm with UV-Vis spectroscopy (corresponding to a Raman shift of 996 cm À1 , i.e.…”
Section: Development Of a Calibration Linementioning
confidence: 99%