2011
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-642-23808-6_2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Influence and Passivity in Social Media

Abstract: The ever-increasing amount of information flowing through Social Media forces the members of these networks to compete for attention and influence by relying on other people to spread their message. A large study of information propagation within Twitter reveals that the majority of users act as passive information consumers and do not forward the content to the network. Therefore, in order for individuals to become influential they must not only obtain attention and thus be popular, but also overcome user pas… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

5
96
2
7

Year Published

2012
2012
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 226 publications
(110 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
5
96
2
7
Order By: Relevance
“…Finally, using networks based on which users follow each other does not necessarily capture all of the interactions that occur online. While some argue that interaction with content (liking or retweeting) is a better measure of impact than followers, 90 others have argued that many users on Twitter are passive and do not interact with the content, 91 and as such, followers may be a better indicator of impact. As this study examined follower networks, it would be helpful for future research to compare followers to different ways of interacting with content in order to better understand the impact of HPV vaccine tweets.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Finally, using networks based on which users follow each other does not necessarily capture all of the interactions that occur online. While some argue that interaction with content (liking or retweeting) is a better measure of impact than followers, 90 others have argued that many users on Twitter are passive and do not interact with the content, 91 and as such, followers may be a better indicator of impact. As this study examined follower networks, it would be helpful for future research to compare followers to different ways of interacting with content in order to better understand the impact of HPV vaccine tweets.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Starting from the above-mentioned position, for the purposes of this study, 7 client activities in SM were defined within the scope of the SM category of Visibility. Consequently, the hypothesis H1 (with the sub-hypotheses H1.1 -H1.7 shown in S1 Appendix) was defined to test the importance of SM visibility (and its associated activities) for KM in companies offering knowledge-based services: H1: The SM Visibility is important for KM Thanks to various client activities, SM generates content that can be used independently of the time of creation, most often as inherited knowledge [65]. Thus, Danis and Singer [66] recognize SM as an IT resource where users consciously leave information about current projects and competencies of those engaged in these projects, which can all serve as knowledge for future use.…”
Section: Measurement Of Key Termsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Twitter, as a free website, is a good platform for the enterprise to promote their products and services. The propagation of the message within Twitter is a hot topic for scientists to study on [13]. Qualitative analysis used in finding crucial users in Twitter is very meaningful for doing effective advertising for the company [14].…”
Section: Application In Marketingmentioning
confidence: 99%