2014 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition 2014
DOI: 10.1109/cvpr.2014.33
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Inferring Analogous Attributes

Abstract: The appearance of an attribute can vary considerably from class to class (e.g., a "fluffy" dog vs. a "fluffy" towel)

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
39
0
1

Year Published

2015
2015
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 50 publications
(40 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
0
39
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The results demonstrate the advantages of attributes as operators, in terms of the accuracy in recognizing unseen attribute-object compositions. We observe significant improvements over state-of-the-art methods for this task [5,33], with absolute improvements of 3%-12%. Finally, we show that our method is similarly robust whether identifying unseen compositions on their own or in the company of seen compositions-which is of great practical value for recognition in realistic, open world settings.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 85%
“…The results demonstrate the advantages of attributes as operators, in terms of the accuracy in recognizing unseen attribute-object compositions. We observe significant improvements over state-of-the-art methods for this task [5,33], with absolute improvements of 3%-12%. Finally, we show that our method is similarly robust whether identifying unseen compositions on their own or in the company of seen compositions-which is of great practical value for recognition in realistic, open world settings.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 85%
“…Accuracy Analogous Attribute [3] 1.4 Red wine [23] 13.1 Attribute as Operator [25] 14.2 VisProd NN [25] 13.9 Label Embedded+ [25] 14.8 TIRG 15.2 Table 3. Comparison to the state-of-the-art on the unseen combination classification task on MIT-States.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Wang et al [21] propose a unified probabilistic model to capture the class-dependent and class-independent attribute relationships, which benefit both attribute prediction and object recognition. [5] models high-order relationship between attribute and category to predict category-sensitive attributes and infer unseen category-attribute pairs by using tensor completion based on a sparse set of category-specific attribute classifiers. Fig.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Instead of learning attribute classifier without considering category information, an importance-weighted linear support vector machine is used to predict attribute category-dependently. To train the t th attribute classifier for category j, the violating attribute label constraints for positive and negative samples from category j are given a higher penalty, as suggested in [5].…”
Section: Category-sensitive Attribute Predictionmentioning
confidence: 99%