2019 IEEE Intelligent Transportation Systems Conference (ITSC) 2019
DOI: 10.1109/itsc.2019.8916939
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Inferring Accurate Bus Trajectories from Noisy Estimated Arrival Time Records

Abstract: Urban commuting data has long been a vital source of understanding population mobility behaviour and has been widely adopted for various applications such as transport infrastructure planning and urban anomaly detection. While individual-specific transaction records (such as smart card (tap-in, tap-out) data or taxi trip records) hold a wealth of information, these are often private data available only to the service provider (e.g., taxicab operator). In this work, we explore the utility in harnessing publicly… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
2
2

Relationship

1
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 22 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…As researchers, we usually strive to enhance utility of applications and algorithms, and often use personalisation as a tool to increase utility. While this is important, an increasing body of work has also emphasized the importance of privacy preservation and the use of less sensitive data [16,20,33,55,58,59]. Personalization and privacy preservation are at the two opposite ends of the spectrum because personalisation has typically required more personal data to provide high utility, while privacy preservation aims at providing reasonable utility from the application, while preserving privacy of users from known risks.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As researchers, we usually strive to enhance utility of applications and algorithms, and often use personalisation as a tool to increase utility. While this is important, an increasing body of work has also emphasized the importance of privacy preservation and the use of less sensitive data [16,20,33,55,58,59]. Personalization and privacy preservation are at the two opposite ends of the spectrum because personalisation has typically required more personal data to provide high utility, while privacy preservation aims at providing reasonable utility from the application, while preserving privacy of users from known risks.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%