2014
DOI: 10.1097/ta.0000000000000248
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Inferior vena cava size is not associated with shock following injury

Abstract: Diagnostic test, level III.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

1
17
1

Year Published

2016
2016
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
1
17
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Paediatric trauma patients in the present cohort who went on to develop shock in the first 24 hours had a significantly flatter IVC on admission CT than those who remained normotensive. The present results are in keeping with findings from the adult literature, which is predominantly in support of IVC calibre as a useful independent predictor of patient outcome 8e12 with only a couple of studies finding IVC calibre unhelpful 14,15 ; although it should be noted that one of these studies was only looking at haemodynamically normal patients.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%
“…Paediatric trauma patients in the present cohort who went on to develop shock in the first 24 hours had a significantly flatter IVC on admission CT than those who remained normotensive. The present results are in keeping with findings from the adult literature, which is predominantly in support of IVC calibre as a useful independent predictor of patient outcome 8e12 with only a couple of studies finding IVC calibre unhelpful 14,15 ; although it should be noted that one of these studies was only looking at haemodynamically normal patients.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%
“…However, one study has found that a flat IVC might not be associated with shock status in patients with moderate injury compared with the population in the present study (ISS score: 14 vs 16.4 and SI: 0.67 vs 0.90). 8 Milia et al 6 have found that age is another modifier and that shock is not significantly correlated to a flat IVC among patients aged >55 years. Nonetheless, the performance of the IVC ratio in this study did not change before and after adjusting for confounders, such as age (Table 2).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…3,7 However, other scholars have found that either a flat IVC in elderly individuals 6 or the static degree of IVC collapse among patients with minor injuries is not associated with shock. 8 Furthermore, other studies have reported that IVC flatness on CT scan is not a valid indicator of lactic acidosis in patients with trauma who have normal hemodynamic findings. 9 The present study aims to identify another method and subpopulation that can be used to evaluate the prediction performance of IVC size accurately.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 98%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Correlat on between pat ents' IVC flatness ndex and shock ndex, Glasgow Coma Score, Injury Sever ty Score, lactate level and base def c t Correlat on Coeff c ent patients 23. In our study, first admission base deficit was found to be worse in flat IVC patients than non-flat IVC patients.Nguyen et al and Liao et al found in their studies that resuscitation of flattened IVC patients required significantly higher amounts of crystalloids and blood products compared to non-flattened IVC patients.17,22 Matsumoto et al in their study with blunt torso trauma patients that flat IVC is an indication of hemodynamic deterioration and requires early blood transfusion in trauma patients.6 On the other hand, Radomski et al, in their study with blunt trauma patients, stated that IVC size in trauma patients was not associated with emergency transfusion 4. In our study, a volume replacement was observed to be higher within 24 hours of clinical outcome in patients with flat IVC.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%