2018
DOI: 10.1111/ajt.14631
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Inferior long-term allograft and patient outcomes among recipients of offspring living donor kidneys

Abstract: While offspring-to-parent living donor kidney transplantations may represent an ideal donor-recipient combination to optimize long-term transplantation outcomes, the sex-specific long-term success of these transplantations remains unclear. We hypothesize that allograft and recipient survivals in offspring-to-parent living donor kidney transplantation differ between men and women due to donor-specific alloimmunization during pregnancy. We retrospectively analyzed long-term allograft and patient survival among m… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
10
1

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 40 publications
(75 reference statements)
1
10
1
Order By: Relevance
“…14,15 It may also explain the increased rate of graft loss associated with increasing pregnancy number (ie, gravidity). 16 However, while these data suggest that a history of pregnancy can affect graft survival or rejection rates in select circumstances, multiple analyses of living donor outcomes have not demonstrated poorer graft outcomes among women who receive a kidney from either a spouse or an offspring [16][17][18][19][20] • Child-to-father n = 21…”
Section: Ghafari Et Al 2008 15mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…14,15 It may also explain the increased rate of graft loss associated with increasing pregnancy number (ie, gravidity). 16 However, while these data suggest that a history of pregnancy can affect graft survival or rejection rates in select circumstances, multiple analyses of living donor outcomes have not demonstrated poorer graft outcomes among women who receive a kidney from either a spouse or an offspring [16][17][18][19][20] • Child-to-father n = 21…”
Section: Ghafari Et Al 2008 15mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although Holscher et al describe using interaction terms in their analyses, 1 our study specifically investigated sex-specific outcomes using stratified analyses throughout the study. 2 With respect to donor characteristics, we chose widely accepted methods of adjusting for recipient and donor factors related to the recipient-donor relationship and our selected outcomes. 2 In addition, we restricted our cohorts to individuals with ≥3 HLA matches (and adjusted for HLA matches), mimicking parent-offspring relationships, to identify a robust nonoffspring control group.…”
Section: Identifying the Best Donor For The Best Recipient: Parents Mmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…2 With respect to donor characteristics, we chose widely accepted methods of adjusting for recipient and donor factors related to the recipient-donor relationship and our selected outcomes. 2 In addition, we restricted our cohorts to individuals with ≥3 HLA matches (and adjusted for HLA matches), mimicking parent-offspring relationships, to identify a robust nonoffspring control group. In contrast, Holscher et al addressed donor age and HLA matches as mediators of the association between recipient-donor relationship and allograft outcomes and elected not to adjust for other important donor characteristics (eg, sex and BMI 4 ).…”
Section: Identifying the Best Donor For The Best Recipient: Parents Mmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Many studies have shown that younger donors result in better outcomes than older donors (7), although some scholars think that renal function can be wasted when kidneys from younger donors are transplanted into older recipients because the recipient may die while the kidney graft is still functional (8). Interestingly, a recent publication by Cohen et al reported that recipients of offspring donors had higher mortality and graft loss (9). BMI is another important factor affecting transplantation outcomes, as donor obesity is a reported risk factor for graft failure.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%