2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.jocn.2019.07.039
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Inferior Fronto-Occipital fascicle anatomy in brain tumor surgeries: From anatomy lab to surgical theater

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
18
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 26 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
0
18
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Reproducible results from the CC were expected due to its large size and unambiguous location of the CC proper, while the CST is arguably one of the most well-studied tracts. The IFOF, while one of the more controversial fasciculi [15][16][17][18], likely results in higher overlap because it is a long anterior-posterior directed pathway spanning from the occipital to frontal lobe, passing through the temporal stem, a tight and small bottleneck region [19] and most protocols agree that nearly any streamline spanning this extent through a ventral route, will belong to this pathway. In all cases, the overlap across protocols is fairly low, with median values of the CC of 0.66 and 0.72 being the highest among all pathways studied.…”
Section: Inter-protocol Variabilitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Reproducible results from the CC were expected due to its large size and unambiguous location of the CC proper, while the CST is arguably one of the most well-studied tracts. The IFOF, while one of the more controversial fasciculi [15][16][17][18], likely results in higher overlap because it is a long anterior-posterior directed pathway spanning from the occipital to frontal lobe, passing through the temporal stem, a tight and small bottleneck region [19] and most protocols agree that nearly any streamline spanning this extent through a ventral route, will belong to this pathway. In all cases, the overlap across protocols is fairly low, with median values of the CC of 0.66 and 0.72 being the highest among all pathways studied.…”
Section: Inter-protocol Variabilitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We examined several white matter tracts originating in visual cortex and included the cerebellum and vermis, which are involved in the calibration of oculomotor tasks. The IFOF provides visual, oculomotor, and attentional connections between occipital cortex (fusiform, lingual, and lateral occipital areas) with areas in the temporal, frontal, and parietal lobes, [35][36][37] and the SLF, which links frontal eye fields with areas of the posterior parietal cortex within and in the vicinity of the IPS. 35,38 The OP, PP, and TP tracts are corticopontine fibers that connect the occipital, parietal, and temporal cortices to the pons, and likely play a role in eye movements.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…By applying such strategy, GTR (>99%), NTR (>95%) and STR (80-95%) were reached in 30%, 42%, 28% of patients, respectively ( 25 ). Unfortunately, despite neuronavigated tractography and intraoperative neurophysiological monitoring, it is impossible to predict language and neuropsycological outcome with asleep craniotomy ( 47 49 ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%