2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.jad.2020.12.199
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Inferior frontal gyrus seed-based resting-state functional connectivity and sustained attention across manic/hypomanic, euthymic and depressive phases of bipolar disorder

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

1
6
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 61 publications
1
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The present study showed that patients with LLD exhibited decreased sFC between the habenula and IFG, which is consistent with the disrupted FC between the habenula and the frontal cortex (middle frontal gyrus and frontal pole) in patients with MDD reported in previous studies 9,12 . The IFG is involved in the perception and interpretation of emotional stimuli, emotion regulation, empathy and emotional perspective‐taking, 25 and dysfunction of the IFG in patients with depression has been reported in previous studies 26 . Therefore, the decreased sFC between the habenula and IFG indicates a functional disconnection of these two important hubs of emotion regulation in patients with LLD.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The present study showed that patients with LLD exhibited decreased sFC between the habenula and IFG, which is consistent with the disrupted FC between the habenula and the frontal cortex (middle frontal gyrus and frontal pole) in patients with MDD reported in previous studies 9,12 . The IFG is involved in the perception and interpretation of emotional stimuli, emotion regulation, empathy and emotional perspective‐taking, 25 and dysfunction of the IFG in patients with depression has been reported in previous studies 26 . Therefore, the decreased sFC between the habenula and IFG indicates a functional disconnection of these two important hubs of emotion regulation in patients with LLD.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
“… 9 , 12 The IFG is involved in the perception and interpretation of emotional stimuli, emotion regulation, empathy and emotional perspective‐taking, 25 and dysfunction of the IFG in patients with depression has been reported in previous studies. 26 Therefore, the decreased sFC between the habenula and IFG indicates a functional disconnection of these two important hubs of emotion regulation in patients with LLD. Additionally, the decreased sFC between the habenula and IFG was negatively associated with the severity of depressive symptoms (especially psychomotor retardation) but not cognitive bias, anxiety/somatization, sleep disturbance or weight, which provides more detailed information about the aspect of depressive symptoms affected by habenular FC.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This difference may be related to the compensatory mechanism described above and, on the other hand, to the variation in depression and anxiety in the included population. Anxiety and depression were found to affect the FC of IFG and brain regions in DMN (Fang et al, 2016;Yan et al, 2019;Yu et al, 2021). Therefore, it is difficult to determine whether insomnia or anxiety and depression had a greater impact Analysis of the correlation between the FC changes and PSQI improvement in all subjects.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…PD patients suffer from depression and tremor may be associated with the abnormal connectivity within the pathological interaction between the basal ganglia and cerebello-thalamo-cortical circuit (Lewis et al, 2011 ). Zeng et al found significant decreased in GM volume in the cerebellar Crus I, Vermis III and VIII in PD patients, demonstrated that cerebellar GM atrophy may also be involved in PD cognitive impairment severity (Zeng et al, 2017 ). For the right cerebellar Crus I, in addition to a possibility of pathophysiological change, the increased GM volume may be a compensation for basal ganglia dysfunction to maintain motor function at a near normal level (Lewis et al, 2011 ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%