Inferential ecosystem models, from network data to prediction

Abstract

Recent developments suggest that predictive modeling could begin to play a larger role not only for data analysis, but also for data collection. We address the example of efficient wireless sensor networks, where inferential ecosystem models can be used to weigh the value of an observation against the cost of data collection. Transmission costs make observations "expensive"; networks will typically be deployed in remote locations without access to infrastructure (e.g., power). The capacity to sample intensively makes sensor networks valuable, but high-frequency data are informative only at specific times and locations. Sampling intervals will range from meters and seconds to landscapes and years, depending on the process, the current states of the system, the uncertainty about those states, and the perceived potential for rapid change. Given that intensive sampling is sometimes critical, but more often wasteful, how do we develop tools to control the measurement and transmission processes? We address the potential of data collection controlled and/or supplemented by inferential ecosystem models. In a given model, the value of an observation can be evaluated in terms of its contribution to estimates of state variables and important parameters. There will be more than one model applied to network data that will include as state variables water, carbon, energy balance, biogeochemistry, tree ecophysiology, and forest demographic processes. The value of an observation will depend on the application. Inference is needed to weigh the contributions against transmission cost. Network control must be dynamic and driven by models capable of learning about both the environment and the network. We discuss application of Bayesian inference to model data from a developing sensor network as a basis for controlling the measurement and transmission processes. Our examples involve soil moisture and sap flux, but we discuss broader application of the approach, including its implications for network design.

The seasonal timing of warming that controls onset of the growing season

“…Using a hierarchical state-space framework (Clark et al, 2011), we draw inference on a (latent) continuous development state h(t) for time t (days) that is related to ordinal discrete stages s t observed at intervals (Fig. Using a hierarchical state-space framework (Clark et al, 2011), we draw inference on a (latent) continuous development state h(t) for time t (days) that is related to ordinal discrete stages s t observed at intervals (Fig.…”

Understanding Forest Health with Remote Sensing-Part II—A Review of Approaches and Data Models

“…They can collect data on various environmental variables which can be used to describe complex ecosystem forest processes continually in a non-invasive, cost-effective, automated and real-time manner [53,[79][80][81]. The design of the network, e.g., the spatial separation of the network nodes (sensor nodes), depends on the spatial variability of the environmental variables and ranges from centimetres to a maximum of about 1km depending on the wireless communication technology used.…”

Integrating empirical–modeling approaches to improve understanding of terrestrial ecology processes

“…Although not explicitly covered by presenters, participants also discussed Bayesian data assimilation (e.g. Clark et al. , 2011) as another valuable avenue for models to inform experimental design and data collection.…”