2006
DOI: 10.1002/sim.2589
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Inferences on standardized mean difference: the generalized variable approach

Abstract: The standardized mean difference has been widely used as the most common index of effect magnitude in many applied fields. In this paper, we propose a novel approach using the concept of generalized variable for the confidence interval estimation and hypothesis testing of standardized mean difference. Furthermore, we extend this approach to compare standardized mean differences between two studies or between two strata. Simulation results demonstrate that the proposed approach can provide confidence intervals … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We used the standardized mean difference (SDM) model in this meta-analysis in view of the differences in the units of CRP measurement used across the included studies [151]. In contrast to the mean difference (MD), which is the difference in the means of the study and control groups, the SMD is the MD divided by the standard deviation (SD), derived from either or both of the groups [151].…”
Section: Data Extraction and Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…We used the standardized mean difference (SDM) model in this meta-analysis in view of the differences in the units of CRP measurement used across the included studies [151]. In contrast to the mean difference (MD), which is the difference in the means of the study and control groups, the SMD is the MD divided by the standard deviation (SD), derived from either or both of the groups [151].…”
Section: Data Extraction and Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We used the standardized mean difference (SDM) model in this meta-analysis in view of the differences in the units of CRP measurement used across the included studies [151]. In contrast to the mean difference (MD), which is the difference in the means of the study and control groups, the SMD is the MD divided by the standard deviation (SD), derived from either or both of the groups [151]. In addition to being independent of the unit of measurement, the SMD has been found to be more generalizable [152] and an easier way to judge the magnitude of difference between the groups [152].…”
Section: Data Extraction and Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, the data were reported with a different unit of measurements, such as millimeters or percentages. To overcome this limitation, all data were reported by "standardized mean difference (SMD)" which is not dependent on the unit (Takeshima et al, 2014;Tian, 2007). It is suggested future studies, to evaluate and report any histologic outcomes of periodontal regeneration, including newly formed bone, cementum, and PDL.…”
Section: Effect Of Biomolecules On the Regeneration Of Furcation Defectsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Considerable attention has also been drawn toward the development of interval estimation methods for standardized mean difference, see Odgaard and Fowler [9], Smithson [10], Steiger and Fouladi [11], Tian [12], Wu, Jiang and Wei [13], and Zou [14], among others. Standardized contrasts of treatment effects and interval procedures are presented in Kline [4], Steiger and Fouladi [11], and Steiger [15] in the context of ANOVA.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%