2017
DOI: 10.1038/s41467-017-01860-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Inference of differentiation time for single cell transcriptomes using cell population reference data

Abstract: Single-cell RNA sequencing (scRNA-seq) is a powerful method for dissecting intercellular heterogeneity during development. Conventional trajectory analysis provides only a pseudotime of development, and often discards cell-cycle events as confounding factors. Here using matched cell population RNA-seq (cpRNA-seq) as a reference, we developed an “iCpSc” package for integrative analysis of cpRNA-seq and scRNA-seq data. By generating a computational model for reference “biological differentiation time” using cell… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
26
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
1
1

Relationship

3
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 34 publications
(29 citation statements)
references
References 41 publications
1
26
0
Order By: Relevance
“…S1C). To test whether these samples were sufficient to capture all cell fates at each developmental stage, we compared the single-cell RNA-sequencing average profile to that of single-embryo RNA-sequencing at each matching stage (Wang et al 2017) using our iCpSc package (Sun et al 2017). The detection of major cell types at stages from EM through to HB apparently reached saturation level at our current coverage depth (Supplemental Fig.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…S1C). To test whether these samples were sufficient to capture all cell fates at each developmental stage, we compared the single-cell RNA-sequencing average profile to that of single-embryo RNA-sequencing at each matching stage (Wang et al 2017) using our iCpSc package (Sun et al 2017). The detection of major cell types at stages from EM through to HB apparently reached saturation level at our current coverage depth (Supplemental Fig.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Actual time-series with interval scale contains temporal information, whereas ordinal scale-based pseudo time-series lacks temporal information. Thus, time-series analysis of scRNA-seq remains a di cult problem 25 and few studies have addressed circadian rhythms in single-cell transcriptomes. To overcome this limitation and to reconstruct actual time-series from single-cell transcriptome datasets, we developed PeakMatch method.…”
Section: Involvement Of Plant Circadian Clocks In Cell Differentiatiomentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, these pseudotime methodologies encounter difficulties in accurately reconstructing branching trajectories in the event that more than one path derives from a single point or from multiple origins, as often happens in in vivo development (as shown in recent studies 29 , 30 ). The main assumption and an intrinsic limitation of the pseudotime reconstruction is that the gene expression similarity reveals the lineage relationship, which sometimes is not real, as there are discontinuous cell states, such as asymmetrical cell division 31 , not to mention that many transcriptome similarities, such as common cell cycle or metabolic states 32 , 33 , are irrelevant to lineage relationships and that factors other than the transcriptome, such as metabolism regulation and splicing regulation, are also vital for lineage differentiation 34 37 . Moreover, the performance and robustness of these pseudotime methods are difficult to benchmark because of large diversity in the outputted data structures and the lack of authentic experimental replicates.…”
Section: Single-cell Approaches To Study Transcription Regulation Formentioning
confidence: 99%