1988
DOI: 10.1007/bf01645068
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Infections following tickbites. Tick-borne encephalitis and lyme borreliosis — A prospective epidemiological study from tyrol

Abstract: We present here a prospective study on infections following tickbites in military recruits in the province of Tyrol (Austria). 84 recruits experienced tickbites and underwent clinical and serological examination twice at four-week intervals for signs of tick borne encephalitis (TBE)-virus or Borrelia burgdorferi infections. 56 and 50 recruits could be evaluated for TBE-virus and Borrelia infection, respectively. Whereas no recruit was found with clinical or laboratory evidence of TBE-virus infection, two (4%) … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
25
0
1

Year Published

1990
1990
2011
2011

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 49 publications
(26 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
0
25
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…A negative serological test result does not exclude previous infection with B burgdorferi, and a positive result may represent an endemic background. [21][22][23] Histological, histochemical, and immunohistochemical detection of microorganisms has turned out to be difficult, frequently unreliable, and almost always extremely time consuming. [23][24][25][26] Cultures with specific media can detect Borrelia species in all clinical forms, but these techniques are not generally available and are unreliable, with less than 50% sensitivity for classic borreliosis.…”
Section: For Editorial Comment See Page 662mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A negative serological test result does not exclude previous infection with B burgdorferi, and a positive result may represent an endemic background. [21][22][23] Histological, histochemical, and immunohistochemical detection of microorganisms has turned out to be difficult, frequently unreliable, and almost always extremely time consuming. [23][24][25][26] Cultures with specific media can detect Borrelia species in all clinical forms, but these techniques are not generally available and are unreliable, with less than 50% sensitivity for classic borreliosis.…”
Section: For Editorial Comment See Page 662mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The results of the screening for serum antibodies to the viruses transmitted through contacts with rodents show that six (4.0%) forestry workers had serum antibodies to PUUV versus one (0.7%) of the clerks. It is interesting to note that four of the PUUV-seropositive individuals worked in areas where 14 clinical cases of HFRS had been diagnosed before [8,18]. Three (2.0%) forestry workers had serum antibiotics to LCMV versus none (0.0%) of the clerks.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Five of them, who had no serum antibodies to LB in 1989, were seropositive in 1990 [18]. None of these five individuals had developed clinical symptoms suggestive of LB during the period between the two samplings [17,19].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…residents, military personnel, foresters) during the tick season. Whereas the incidence of TBE seroconversions was mostly about ~ 1.6% (0-2.9%) [33][34][35][36], the incidence of HGA-seroconversion events approached ~ 6% (3.2-11.1%) [37][38][39]. Although data from different situations and periods are difficult to compare, an incidence rate of concomitant TBEV and A. phagocytophilum infections in European endemic areas could nonetheless be expected to be of an order of 0.001% (assuming independence, overlapping incubation periods, and a tick season lasting about 25 weeks per year).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%