2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.jse.2014.12.036
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Infection after primary anatomic versus primary reverse total shoulder arthroplasty

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

2
38
1

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
5

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 78 publications
(43 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
2
38
1
Order By: Relevance
“…There is an infection rate of 0.7% to 3.29% following conventional total shoulder replacement; 41,46,59,60 0.5% to 2.7% following shoulder hemiarthroplasty; 41,45,59,78 and up to 5% following reverse shoulder arthroplasty. 12,41,60,97 Florschutz et al, 60 Smucny et al 94 and Richards et al 41 all reported higher infection rates in patients undergoing reverse shoulder arthroplasty compared to anatomic total shoulder arthroplasty. Revision shoulder arthroplasty had a much higher risk of infection with rates of 7% 55 to 32%.…”
Section: Incidence Of Psimentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There is an infection rate of 0.7% to 3.29% following conventional total shoulder replacement; 41,46,59,60 0.5% to 2.7% following shoulder hemiarthroplasty; 41,45,59,78 and up to 5% following reverse shoulder arthroplasty. 12,41,60,97 Florschutz et al, 60 Smucny et al 94 and Richards et al 41 all reported higher infection rates in patients undergoing reverse shoulder arthroplasty compared to anatomic total shoulder arthroplasty. Revision shoulder arthroplasty had a much higher risk of infection with rates of 7% 55 to 32%.…”
Section: Incidence Of Psimentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Whereas C acnes and S epidermidis are frequently noted contaminants and infectious agents in the literature, E Coli is not. 1,2,9,33,34 One prior study using NGS in revision shoulder arthroplasty cases identified E coli in 2 of the 44 (5%) revision cases. 24 Yet, NGS in our study identified a surprisingly high presence of E Coli in 20% (5/25) of the skin samples and in 16% (4/25) of the deep tissue samples.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The novel role of these bacteria is partly driven by advances in the medical field, including the now common use of joint prostheses and catheters; commonly being contaminated by the skin microbiota, including Staphylococcus epidermidis and C . acnes [ 12 ], showing a localization-triggered bacterial pathogenesis [ 13 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%