2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.jse.2019.07.039
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Next-generation sequencing for diagnosis of infection: is more sensitive really better?

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 26 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
(46 reference statements)
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…in 20 of those samples was less than 5% (less than 1% in 16 samples), so they would not be considered positive for Cutibacterium sp. according to even the most lenient proportional abundance thresholds (one study used 10% [ 39 ] and another reported that 59.5% was optimal [ 40 ]). The two samples with the highest proportional abundance of Cutibacterium sp.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…in 20 of those samples was less than 5% (less than 1% in 16 samples), so they would not be considered positive for Cutibacterium sp. according to even the most lenient proportional abundance thresholds (one study used 10% [ 39 ] and another reported that 59.5% was optimal [ 40 ]). The two samples with the highest proportional abundance of Cutibacterium sp.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recent studies have evaluated the use of new technologies, such as polymerase chain reaction and next-generation sequencing (NGS), as adjuncts in the organism-identification process. However, their utilities remain unknown with several studies reporting no increase in sensitivity or specificity compared to traditional tissue cultures and NGS demonstrating a false positive rate of up to 35% and 25% in primary and revision arthroplasties, respectively, [ [35] , [36] , [37] , [38] ]. In addition, intrahospital and interhospital variations in protocols and incubation times may affect the accuracy and capability of cultures to identify organisms, especially lower-virulence and slower-replicating organisms [ [39] , [40] , [41] , [42] ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Even with bacterial load thresholds set for these specific pathogens, it is difficult to differentiate between true pathogens and contaminants. Therefore, we need a comprehensive analysis combining multiple factors, such as a higher proportion of prosthetic shoulder joint infections caused by D. acnes compared to other joints [24] .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%