2011
DOI: 10.1016/j.ejvs.2011.08.005
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Infected Viabahn Stent Graft in the Superficial Femoral Artery

Abstract: We present a case of an infected stent graft in the superficial femoral artery (SFA). A 67-year-old woman underwent excision of an infected Viabahn stent graft. At exploration there was no apparent artery around the majority of the stent graft, suggesting that the SFA had been autolysed. Infected stents and stent grafts are rare in the SFA position. The risk of infection is likely minimised with standard treatments including drainage of infection prior to stent graft placement and periprocedural antibiotic adm… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
19
1

Year Published

2014
2014
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
(2 reference statements)
0
19
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The incidence of stent-graft infection after endovascular aortic aneurysm repair had been reported as 0.4-1.0 % [8,9]. Diabetes and smoking independently increase the infection risk; however, other risk factors previously reported for endovascular procedures, such as absence of sterility, lack of antibiotic prophylaxis, introducer sheath permanence more than 24 h, multiple stents implantation, or multiple procedures in the same region [3], were not present in our case. Infected stent and/or stent-graft usually appear as device thrombosis, septic embolization, pseudoaneurysm, and hemorrhage [10].…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 46%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The incidence of stent-graft infection after endovascular aortic aneurysm repair had been reported as 0.4-1.0 % [8,9]. Diabetes and smoking independently increase the infection risk; however, other risk factors previously reported for endovascular procedures, such as absence of sterility, lack of antibiotic prophylaxis, introducer sheath permanence more than 24 h, multiple stents implantation, or multiple procedures in the same region [3], were not present in our case. Infected stent and/or stent-graft usually appear as device thrombosis, septic embolization, pseudoaneurysm, and hemorrhage [10].…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 46%
“…Infected stent and/or stent-graft usually appear as device thrombosis, septic embolization, pseudoaneurysm, and hemorrhage [10]. Schneider et al [3] reported a single case of SFA autolysis after Viabahn stent-graft implantation for SFA atherosclerotic disease. The authors advocated the role of malperfusion and foot gangrene as the source of infection.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Alternative techniques of repair, such as an interposition vein graft or surgical bypass (also with vein), carry a low risk of infection. However, case reports of infected PTFE stent grafts are very few, [10][11][12] and so in this emergency setting, the endovascular approach was deemed most appropriate, with less infection risk than with surgical bypass or interposition grafting (even with autologous vein conduit). Given that the previously published cases do not describe length of stay or mobility outcomes, it is difficult to compare the efficacy of this treatment.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There are only three published case reports of PTFE stent graft infections in the lower extremity. [10][11][12] This institution managed a case of a large (6.9 cm in diameter) nonmycotic ruptured PAA, which was successfully treated with endovascular repair using the GORE VIABAHN stent graft and evacuation of popliteal fossa hematoma through a medial distal thigh incision. None of the previously published 11 cases of ruptured PAAs were treated with the combined technique of endovascular intervention and hematoma evacuation.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%