2017
DOI: 10.4103/0975-7341.207164
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Infected nonunion with implant In Situ in long bone fractures, managed by retention of implant-our experience

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, it remains unknown if severity of infection and bone-healing is worse in osteoporotic bone with FRI. Clinically, the current consensus is to retain the implant if fixation is stable, as early implant removal will cause soft-tissue damage and worsening of infection. 21 One recent animal study also showed that instability leads to more pronounced local immune responses in a FRI model. 40 Despite the moderate effect of systemic antibiotic treatment on bacteria eradication and fracture-healing, its effect on FRI in osteoporosis also remains poorly understood.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…However, it remains unknown if severity of infection and bone-healing is worse in osteoporotic bone with FRI. Clinically, the current consensus is to retain the implant if fixation is stable, as early implant removal will cause soft-tissue damage and worsening of infection. 21 One recent animal study also showed that instability leads to more pronounced local immune responses in a FRI model. 40 Despite the moderate effect of systemic antibiotic treatment on bacteria eradication and fracture-healing, its effect on FRI in osteoporosis also remains poorly understood.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…7,20 The major difficulty for FRI treatment is therefore eradicating the biofilm formed on the implant, as well as the colony-forming units (CFUs) in the OLCN. 18,21 It remains unknown whether systemic antibiotics can effectively treat and promote healing in osteoporotic bone with FRI. 22 This study aims to assess: 1) whether osteoporotic bone with FRI presents with more severe infection compared to normal bone with FRI; and 2) fracture healing and the effect of systemic antibiotics on pathogen clearance in both osteoporotic and normal bone with FRI.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Bone healing may take a few weeks and sometimes several months, impacting the quality of life. Infection post-surgery is challenging to handle, making patient life even harder [ 2 ]. Bone tissues are unique as they can heal themselves after damage.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%