2017 Fourth International Conference on Advances in Biomedical Engineering (ICABME) 2017
DOI: 10.1109/icabme.2017.8167539
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Inexpensive Virtual Assisted Rehabilitation System (VARS) for lower part injuries

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
2
1

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 2 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The results also confirmed positive feedback even without the previous experience of patients with virtual reality [10]. For this reason, systems have been developed, such as the Rehabilitation gaming system (RGS) [11], Computer Assisted Rehabilitation Environment (CAREN) [12] or Virtual Assisted Rehabilitation System (VARS, lowcost solution) [13]. Most of the systems using high immersive technologies like VR has a positive effect on minimizing recovery time and training progress [14].…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 63%
“…The results also confirmed positive feedback even without the previous experience of patients with virtual reality [10]. For this reason, systems have been developed, such as the Rehabilitation gaming system (RGS) [11], Computer Assisted Rehabilitation Environment (CAREN) [12] or Virtual Assisted Rehabilitation System (VARS, lowcost solution) [13]. Most of the systems using high immersive technologies like VR has a positive effect on minimizing recovery time and training progress [14].…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 63%
“…Bayan et al proposed an experimental rehab system for patients with lower-limb injuries. 78 Their system was made of VR eyeglasses for providing a virtual environment, EMG shield for analyzing muscle activity, an accelerometer for tracking the movements of users, and pressure sensors to measure the feet forces on the ground. sEMG and accelerometer sensors were attached on participants’ feet.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%