2022
DOI: 10.1212/wnl.0000000000200819
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Inertial Gait Sensors to Measure Mobility and Functioning in Hereditary Spastic Paraplegia

Abstract: Background and objectives:Hereditary spastic paraplegia (HSP) causes progressive spasticity and weakness of the lower limbs. As neurological examination and the clinical Spastic Paraplegia Rating Scale (SPRS) are subject to potential patient- and clinician-dependent bias, instrumented gait analysis bears the potential to objectively quantify impaired gait. The aim of the present study was to investigate gait cyclicity parameters by application of a mobile gait analysis system in a cross sectional cohort of HSP… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

2
26
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

2
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(37 citation statements)
references
References 43 publications
2
26
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We identified 14 measures discriminating ARSACS patients from HC with large effect sizes (|δ| > 0.8), with the top three measures – Lateral Step Deviation, SPcmp and Swing CV – all capturing aspects of spatiotemporal stride variability. This finding corroborates and extends previous studies, demonstrating that measures of spatiotemporal stride variability are increased in ataxia, with effect sizes similar to those observed in this study (6, 7, 30); and – with, however only one study ever reported so far – also in HSP (11). Here, we demonstrate the discriminative validity of these measures the first time for ARSACS, a particular multisystemic disease combining not only ataxia and HSP features, but also severe neuropathy.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…We identified 14 measures discriminating ARSACS patients from HC with large effect sizes (|δ| > 0.8), with the top three measures – Lateral Step Deviation, SPcmp and Swing CV – all capturing aspects of spatiotemporal stride variability. This finding corroborates and extends previous studies, demonstrating that measures of spatiotemporal stride variability are increased in ataxia, with effect sizes similar to those observed in this study (6, 7, 30); and – with, however only one study ever reported so far – also in HSP (11). Here, we demonstrate the discriminative validity of these measures the first time for ARSACS, a particular multisystemic disease combining not only ataxia and HSP features, but also severe neuropathy.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
“…Digital gait outcomes obtained through wearable sensors have shown promising results in other genetic ataxias, with several cross-sectional studies demonstrating reliable discrimination between patients and controls, and correlation with clinical measures of disease severity(68); and first longitudinal studies also demonstrating sensitivity to change(5, 9). In contrast, wearable sensor-based gait studies are still scarce in hereditary spastic paraplegias (HSPs)(10, 11), and no genotype-specific studies on sensor-based gait measures have been conducted in spastic ataxias, let alone in spastic ataxias with prominent multi-systemic involvement like ARSACS. Moreover, multi-center studies – as inevitably required for trials in such rare diseases – are very scarce in ataxias(7) and HSPs, demonstrating the urgent need for multi-center validation of performance and outcome validity.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moreover, gait variability was significantly associated with changes in mental health functioning as measured by the SF-12 mental component score. In conjunction with the previously reported application of the present mobile gait analysis system in a cross-sectional multicenter HSP cohort, 16 the present study paves the ground for future application of mobile gait analysis in interventional studies, genotype specific natural history studies, and in the patients' home environments.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 57%
“…Mobile gait analysis was performed during a 4 × 10 m walking test. Gait cyclicity parameters (stride time, stance time, and swing duration) and their respective coefficient of variation (CV) values were obtained as previously described 16 . In addition, we measured the times to complete the first 10 m and to complete the Timed Up and Go test (TUG) 20 .…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation