1938
DOI: 10.1039/tf9383400011
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Inertia and driving force of chemical reactions

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

52
1,037
2
10

Year Published

1996
1996
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1,563 publications
(1,143 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
52
1,037
2
10
Order By: Relevance
“…Very similar values have been reported for other phases such as MnO 2 [24] and MnO [45], and the employed value is therefore expected to be reasonably representative for the manganese oxide system. The employed heats of desorption for the various metal oxides are in good agreement with the Brønsted-Evans-Polanyi [48,49] relationship for isotopic 16 O 2 / 18 O 2 exchange reported by Boreskov [46]. No direct measurement of the heat of oxygen desorption for CeO 2 could be found.…”
Section: Sources For the Heat Of Oxygen Chemisorptionsupporting
confidence: 69%
“…Very similar values have been reported for other phases such as MnO 2 [24] and MnO [45], and the employed value is therefore expected to be reasonably representative for the manganese oxide system. The employed heats of desorption for the various metal oxides are in good agreement with the Brønsted-Evans-Polanyi [48,49] relationship for isotopic 16 O 2 / 18 O 2 exchange reported by Boreskov [46]. No direct measurement of the heat of oxygen desorption for CeO 2 could be found.…”
Section: Sources For the Heat Of Oxygen Chemisorptionsupporting
confidence: 69%
“…32,381,492,493,[516][517][518] Hence, if the zeolite increases the relative free energy of one of the reaction intermediates, the corresponding transition state increases similarly. The consequences of this relation are that the differences in the free energies of the transition states of competing reactions can be estimated from the differences in the free energies of formation of the corresponding reaction intermediates (see Figure 59).…”
Section: Transition State Selectivitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…32 This linear relationship between the Gibbs free energy of formation of transition states and that of products is an example of the semiempirical Brønsted-Evans-Polanyi relationship. 32,492,493 According to this relationship, the prohibitively high Gibbs free energy of formation (and adsorption) of RR-dimethylalkane products inside TON-type zeolites 190,490,491,494 is an indication of a similarly high Gibbs free energy of formation of the transition state for RR-dimethylalkane formation, so that transition state shape selectivity will inhibit RRdimethylalkane product formation inside TON-type zeolite Figure 53. The hydrocracking precursors and products obtained by applying the mechanism shown in Figure 52 to C 10 .…”
Section: Transition State Shape Selectivitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Fortunately, there are some empirical relations correlating the activation energy and reactivity with the chemisorption energy of reactants. One of them, the Brønsted-EvansPolanyi (BEP) relation [69][70][71][72], states that the activation energy for an elementary reaction step on surface depends linearly on the reaction energy, that is, the difference between the chemisorption energy of the products and the reactants. An example [72] for the activation energies for N 2 dissociation over various metal surfaces are shown in Fig.…”
Section: Reactivity and Selectivity In Heterogeneous Catalysismentioning
confidence: 99%