2012
DOI: 10.1080/10615806.2011.619259
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Inequity in work and intimate relationships: a Spillover–Crossover model

Abstract: This study among 267 Greek teachers and their partners tested and expanded the recently proposed Spillover-Crossover model (SCM) of well-being. Accordingly, experiences built up at work spill over to the home domain, and then influence the partner. The authors integrated equity theory in the model by formulating hypotheses about exchange in interpersonal relationships. Structural equation modeling analyses supported the spillover hypothesis that teachers who lose their work engagement as a result of an inequit… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
23
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 26 publications
(23 citation statements)
references
References 45 publications
0
23
0
Order By: Relevance
“…At the same time, Baucom, Whisman, and Paprocki (2012) indicate that a couple's relationship may deteriorate if depressed individuals perceive themselves as unpleasant for the partner or feel their partner is unsupportive. Some studies have demonstrated that negative marital interactions are a key driver of negative crossover effects (Bakker, Petrou, & Tsaousis, 2012;Shimazu, Bakker, & Demerouti, 2009;Steiner & Krings, 2016), which, in turn, decreases well-being for both members of the couple (Steiner & Krings, 2016). Nevertheless, it should be noted that the associations between each member of the dyad depression and their own level of satisfaction with family life were stronger than the crossover associations between the dyad, suggesting that spillover is more relevant than crossover in the association between depression and satisfaction with family life.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…At the same time, Baucom, Whisman, and Paprocki (2012) indicate that a couple's relationship may deteriorate if depressed individuals perceive themselves as unpleasant for the partner or feel their partner is unsupportive. Some studies have demonstrated that negative marital interactions are a key driver of negative crossover effects (Bakker, Petrou, & Tsaousis, 2012;Shimazu, Bakker, & Demerouti, 2009;Steiner & Krings, 2016), which, in turn, decreases well-being for both members of the couple (Steiner & Krings, 2016). Nevertheless, it should be noted that the associations between each member of the dyad depression and their own level of satisfaction with family life were stronger than the crossover associations between the dyad, suggesting that spillover is more relevant than crossover in the association between depression and satisfaction with family life.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…In this study, well‐being at work is captured by its positive dimension—work engagement—and its negative dimension—burnout, which are both relevant for health outcomes and performance indicators both at work and at home (see Bakker, Petrou, & Tsaousis, ; Schaufeli & Bakker, ). Work engagement is defined as ‘a positive, full‐filling, work‐related state of mind that is characterized by vigor, dedication, and absorption.…”
Section: Well‐being At Work and The Work–home Interfacementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Finally, this study contributes to the literature on the spillover and crossover of stress. Namely, while other studies on work spillover have focused on outcomes such as well‐being, affect, and job and marital satisfaction (e.g., Bakker et al, 2012; Ferguson et al, 2015; Liu et al, 2016; Sonnentag & Binnewies, 2013), this study highlights the possibility of a different type of spillover—namely, spillover of work‐related aggression to the virtual context. By doing so, we demonstrate that the impersonal nature of the online environment may make it a suitable context for the displacement of people’s frustrations.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 67%