Inequality of health stock and the relation to national wealth

Abstract

BackgroundThe decline in global and between-country health inequality is a major challenge to overcome. However, few studies have systematically investigated the relationship between inequality of health stock and national wealth. From an economic perspective, health can be viewed as a durable capital stock that produces an output of healthy time. Therefore, in this paper, we focused on health capital to investigate the relationship between inequalities of national health and national wealth.MethodsBased on health stock data from 1990 to 2015 for 140 countries, we estimated Gini coefficients of health stock to investigate associations with a well-known economic flow indicator, Gross Domestic Product (GDP), stock-based national wealth indicator, Inclusive Wealth Index (IWI), and firm-level net income.ResultsThe estimated Gini coefficient of global health stock shows that health stock has experienced a global decline. The Gini coefficient for low-income countries (LICs) showed the fastest decline in health stock, dropping from 0.69 to 0.66 in 25 years. Next, rapid population growth and the rise in the youth share of the working-age population in LICs were most likely contributing factors to the decline in inequality. Most countries that experienced positive health stock growth also indicated a strong positive relationship with GDP and IWI. However, some countries showed a negative relationship with natural capital, which is a part of IWI. In addition, firm-level net income showed no obvious associations with health stock, GDP and IWI.ConclusionsWe argue that a negative relationship between health stock and natural capital is a sign of unstable development because sustainable development involves maintaining not only GDP but also IWI, as it is a collective set of assets or wealth comprising human, produced and natural capital. Moreover, in our analysis of firm-level income data, we also discuss that income will be influenced by other factors, such as innovations, human resources, organization culture and strategy. Therefore, the paper concludes that health stock is a vital component in measuring health inequality and health-related Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs). Thus, IWI is more comprehensive in measuring national wealth and can complement GDP in measuring progress toward sustainable development.

Public Opinion and Expectations: Development of Public Health Education in China After COVID-19 Pandemic

“…For example, as the real GDP per capita of the world increased by 180% between 1970 and 2007 and infant mortality fell by 50% ( 25 ). The study of Jumbri et al ( 26 ) also showed a link between economic status and health development. They found that residents of areas with better economic conditions are more likely to pursue high-quality health, which is yet another piece of evidence of the relationship between economics and health.…”

Measurement of the Energy Intensity of Human Well-Being and Spatial Econometric Analysis of Its Influencing Factors

“…Compared with the existing energy efficiency indicators, one of the main advantages of EIWB is that EIWB provides a new perspective of thinking and research. EI and TFEE both define energy efficiency as the relationship between energy input and economic output [15][16][17], while economic output cannot be simply equal to the health status and well-being of residents [18]. In other words, at the beginning of design, EI and TFEE did not highlight that the ultimate goal of economic development is to achieve development of human being.…”