Inequality in organizations: stereotyping, discrimination, and labor law exclusions

Abstract

Purpose -The purpose of this article is to highlight inequalities created and sustained through gendered, raced, and classed organizational processes and practices using Joan Acker's work as a lens for perceiving the mechanisms that support such practices. It aims to use home health aide work as an example of how US labor laws and court decisions create and support disadvantages for workers who are largely economically-disadvantaged and often women of color. Design/methodology/approach -The article considers processes of inequality based on demographic characteristics and the resulting stereotyping, discrimination, and gender, race, and class inequalities. Findings -The article finds that multiple intersecting processes of inequality exist in organizations, manifested in practices of stereotyping and discrimination for some job applicants and workers and advantageous positioning for certain others. Research limitations/implications -Future research should more specifically consider the effects of multiple processes of inequality on individuals' organizational experiences and the intersections of gender, race, and class (as well as other markers such as ethnicity, sexual orientation, and disability) in organizational practices. Practical implications -Managers and human resources practitioners should be aware of the effects of processes related to the intersectionality of gender, race, and class and work to eliminate resulting stereotyping and other discriminatory organizational practices linked to these processes in their organizations. Social implications -Identification of processes of inequality resulting in stereotyping and discrimination may help reduce them, thus increasing opportunities for work, wages, and benefits, and reducing poverty for members of the most devalued groups. Originality/value -This research contributes to the literature on the intersecting nature of gender, race, and class-based inequalities and on human resources decision making in organizations.

Bios, mythoi and women entrepreneurs: A Wynterian analysis of the intersectional impacts of the COVID-19 pandemic on self-employed women and women-owned businesses

“…Like experiences of health, experiences of work and entrepreneurship are not neutral but affected by social positionality (Alfrey and Twine, 2017;Berry and Bell, 2012;Villares-Varela, 2017). The self-employed comprise a smaller segment of the labour market than the employed (Moskalenko and Beresford, 2018;Wales and Agyiri, 2016), but one that is quickly growing.…”

Diversity, Discrimination, and Persistent Inequality: Hope for the Future through the Solidarity Economy Movement

“…It is often measured by the degree of inequality in a society, and is hastened by actions of institutions (Acker, ), with increased societal income leading to greater inequality. Categorical distinctions, such as race and sex, allow for distribution of inequality, through exploitation and exclusion by those with greater access to resources (Acker, ; Berry & Bell, ; Massey, ). For Blacks in America, exploitation and exclusion continue to be very real constants that began early in the country's history.…”

Perceived compensation discrimination against physically disabled people in Andalusia

“…Many very varied aspects of human resource management have been linked to discrimination: compensation (Berry, 2012;Blau & Kahn, 1992;Marini, 1989;Morrison & Von Glinow, 1990;Stroh, Brett, & Reilly, 1992), possibilities of career development (O'Neil, Hopkins, & Sullivan, 2011;Reskin, 1993;Wright, Ferris, Hiller, & Kroll, 1995), working conditions (Sanchez & Brock, 1996;Wyld, 2008), performance assessment (Erford & Crockett, 2012;Reskin, 1993), segregation or division of work and the design or assignment of jobs (Blau & Kahn, 1992;Reskin, 1993).…”