1997
DOI: 10.1103/physrevd.56.3135
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Inelasticity inp-nucleus collisions and its application to high energy cosmic-ray cascades

Abstract: We employ a simple multiple scattering model to investigate the inclusive reaction pϩA→pϩX for projectile momenta in the 100-200 GeV/c range. We find that data are consistent with a class of interaction models in which the stopping power of nuclei is rather low. We discuss extrapolation to ultrahigh energy and the application to interpretation of cosmic-ray air showers at energies up to 10 20 eV. ͓S0556-2821͑97͒06017-7͔PACS number͑s͒: 95.55. Vj, 13.15.ϩg, 13.60.Hb, 96.40.Tv PHYSICAL

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
29
0

Year Published

1999
1999
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 30 publications
(31 citation statements)
references
References 46 publications
2
29
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In the 1-100 TeV primary energy range, their predictions for p-air are quite similar, while there are larger differences for the estimates of the rate of diffraction processes and for the inelasticity of proton air interactions [53,54]. This last quantity essentially gives the fraction of energy available for particle production [55][56][57] and is particularly important for the longitudinal development of the shower in the atmosphere. Actually the two models that show the largest differences among them are QGSJET-I and SIBYLL-2.1, while QGSJET-II.03 gives predictions closer to those of SIBYLL-2.1 (see for instance [58]).…”
Section: Analysis Results and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…In the 1-100 TeV primary energy range, their predictions for p-air are quite similar, while there are larger differences for the estimates of the rate of diffraction processes and for the inelasticity of proton air interactions [53,54]. This last quantity essentially gives the fraction of energy available for particle production [55][56][57] and is particularly important for the longitudinal development of the shower in the atmosphere. Actually the two models that show the largest differences among them are QGSJET-I and SIBYLL-2.1, while QGSJET-II.03 gives predictions closer to those of SIBYLL-2.1 (see for instance [58]).…”
Section: Analysis Results and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…n) occurs around 40% of the time at accelerator energies (Dao et al 1974;Engler et al 1975;Flauger & Mönning 1976;Blobel et al 1978;Forti et al 1990;Frichter et al 1997) and this fraction is predicted by Gribov-Regge theory and Monte Carlo modeling to be only very weakly energy dependent 9 The IBIS telescope on board INTEGRAL has also recently released a preliminary result for the detection of a GC source in the EGRET energy range ( Di Cocco et al 2004). Werner 1993;Engel 2001;Huang et al 2002;Ostapchenko 2003).…”
Section: Detailed Calculation Of Neutron Flux From P-p Collisionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Hence, we take the leading neutron multiplicity, m n , to be given by a fixed proportion of 0.4 (i.e., 40% of all p-p interactions involve charge exchange, independent of incoming proton energy). Further, the highest energy experimental data available indicate, for p-p interactions, an averaged leading neutron elasticity of hx n i ¼ 0:25 (Frichter et al 1997).…”
Section: Detailed Calculation Of Neutron Flux From P-p Collisionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Their results for a QCD pomeron with an asymptotic intercept ∆ = 0.097 are presented, these cross-sections are slightly larger than those for model 3. Also Frichter et al (1997) extrapolate results from accelerator measurements to high energies. They use relative low inelasticities and in turn obtain cross-sections larger as the previous model.…”
Section: Inelastic Cross-sectionsmentioning
confidence: 99%