1985
DOI: 10.1103/physrevc.31.1616
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Inelastic scattering of 65 MeV protons fromC12,Mg

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
56
0

Year Published

2003
2003
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 50 publications
(58 citation statements)
references
References 45 publications
2
56
0
Order By: Relevance
“…16 the theoretical cross sections for inelastic proton scattering on a 28 Si target. Inelastic cross section calculated considering three various levels of implementation of the MPMH method are compared to experiment [55]. Qualitatively, the results are in accordance with the previous electron scattering study.…”
Section: Inelastic Proton Scatteringsupporting
confidence: 81%
“…16 the theoretical cross sections for inelastic proton scattering on a 28 Si target. Inelastic cross section calculated considering three various levels of implementation of the MPMH method are compared to experiment [55]. Qualitatively, the results are in accordance with the previous electron scattering study.…”
Section: Inelastic Proton Scatteringsupporting
confidence: 81%
“…= 30 • to 120 • . The fit to the experimental data in the present MCC calculation is superior to the previous coupled-channel calculations that were based on the phenomenological treatment in the coupling potential [10][11][12]. Reproduction of the experiments by the microscopically derived nuclear interactions is an important development in the theoretical calculations.…”
Section: Summery and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 62%
“…Nucleon scattering from carbon is very important in the fields of nuclear engineering [8] and medical technology [9]. There are several coupled-channel (CC) calculations of the p + 12 C inelastic scattering at the energy of E p ≤ 65 MeV [10][11][12]. However, in these CC calculations, the nuclear potentials are treated in a phenomenological manner, and there is no approach of the full microscopic coupled-channels calculation, in which the nuclear interactions are calculated from a microscopic wave function of 12 C based on the nucleon degrees of freedom and a reliable nucleon-nucleon (NN) interaction.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In Fig. 9, the CC-SRM results are compared with the experimental data 17,33,36) of the angular distributions of proton inelastic scattering leading to the 2 + (1.779 MeV), 4 + (4.617 MeV), 6 + (8.543 MeV) states and the first negative parity 3 − (6.879 MeV) state. The calculation reproduces the experimental data rather well.…”
Section: Comparisons Of CC Calculations With Experimentalmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…8 Comparison of the calculated and experimental angular distributions 17,[31][32][33][34][35] for proton elastic scattering from 28 Si nucleus Fig. 9 Comparison of the calculated and experimental angular distributions 17,33,36) for proton inelastic scattering from 28 Si nucleus tory, although the prediction is somewhat larger than the experimental data below 30 MeV. For 30 Si, only the calculated angular distributions of proton inelastic scattering leading to 2 + (2.236 MeV) and 3 − (5.488 MeV) states at 51.9 MeV are compared with experimental ones 17) in Fig.…”
Section: Comparisons Of CC Calculations With Experimentalmentioning
confidence: 99%