2014
DOI: 10.1002/sej.1179
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Industry Evolution and Entrepreneurship:StevenKlepper's Contributions to Industrial Organization, Strategy, Technological Change, and Entrepreneurship

Abstract: In this review of Steven Klepper's contributions in industry evolution, employee entrepreneurship, and geographical clusters, we trace the evolution of his scholarly career. Combining insights from an in-depth interview, our own experiences with him, and our retrospective review, we also note some salient characteristics of the process that Klepper employed while undertaking his research projects, an approach we believe was integral to the fundamental insights evidenced in the content of his scholarly work.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
14
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 107 publications
0
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Shane and Venkataraman (2000) assumed that entrepreneurs are more likely to recognize opportunities where to competitive is advantageous; the information market is there to be exploited and to motivate good forecasts for the future. The industry is changing to a more articulated world looking for nonbarrier patterns to lead entrepreneurship to rapid development based on evolving industrial forces that make the environment understandable to economic actors (Agarwal & Braguinsky, 2015). In developing countries, it is well known that industrial profile is less diversified and more fragmented, as well, the incomplete economic structure does not allow new entrants, and entrepreneurial skills are constrained by specific constraints of industry (Calá, Arauzo-Carod, & Manjón-Antolín, 2015).…”
Section: Theoretical Background and Hypothesesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Shane and Venkataraman (2000) assumed that entrepreneurs are more likely to recognize opportunities where to competitive is advantageous; the information market is there to be exploited and to motivate good forecasts for the future. The industry is changing to a more articulated world looking for nonbarrier patterns to lead entrepreneurship to rapid development based on evolving industrial forces that make the environment understandable to economic actors (Agarwal & Braguinsky, 2015). In developing countries, it is well known that industrial profile is less diversified and more fragmented, as well, the incomplete economic structure does not allow new entrants, and entrepreneurial skills are constrained by specific constraints of industry (Calá, Arauzo-Carod, & Manjón-Antolín, 2015).…”
Section: Theoretical Background and Hypothesesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While empirical studies support the view that conditions in the parent organisation are an important trigger to spin-off formation, with the inherited organisational knowledge and capabilities of spin-off firms affecting both the initial performance and long-run survival rates of spin-offs, the mechanism of spin-off formation and the genealogical inheritance across spin-offs are still unresolved issues (Agarwal and Braguinsky, 2015).…”
Section: Research Questionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In Klepper's view, the perceived benefits of clustering stemmed directly from firm heritage while clustering in itself did not provide benefits to local firms. Doing so, Klepper challenged standard theory which he somewhat ironically described as the 'not-so-wellfounded beliefs' about agglomeration economies (Agarwal and Braguinsky 2014).…”
Section: Industry Clustering: Marshall Versus Kleppermentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Besides an effect on entry, they also found an effect on survival: firms that entered in the same region and same industry had higher survival rates when hiring former colleagues and workers from the same industry and the same region. These findings of Carias and Klepper (2010) led Agarwal and Braguinsky (2014) to conclude that "… pooling of labour resources may … be caused not so much by general external effects available to all firms in clusters, but by a targeted mechanism through which founders of new firms hire their former colleagues for the superior knowledge they possess" (p. 23).…”
Section: Some Unresolved Issuesmentioning
confidence: 99%