The platform will undergo maintenance on Sep 14 at about 7:45 AM EST and will be unavailable for approximately 2 hours.
1988
DOI: 10.18356/f1ae6f29-en
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Industrial revolution, technological paradigm and regional alternatives

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

1992
1992
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 3 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…As the outcome of the literature suggests, the nature of the theories lie in the paradigm shifts in socio-economic factors. Transformation of these factors is trigged by industrial revolutions (Nochteff, 1988) and is clearly perceived within the reviewed literature. From a rise of international trade of manually constructed goodies known as proto-industrialization (Ogilvie and Cerman, 1996) exploited to a first industrial revolution, breaking any commonly established economic theories (Clark, 2014).…”
Section: Discussion and Suggestion For Further Researchmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As the outcome of the literature suggests, the nature of the theories lie in the paradigm shifts in socio-economic factors. Transformation of these factors is trigged by industrial revolutions (Nochteff, 1988) and is clearly perceived within the reviewed literature. From a rise of international trade of manually constructed goodies known as proto-industrialization (Ogilvie and Cerman, 1996) exploited to a first industrial revolution, breaking any commonly established economic theories (Clark, 2014).…”
Section: Discussion and Suggestion For Further Researchmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Under this conception, even the advanced semi-industrialized countries are expected to acquire control only over second-tier , standardized technologies and practices. Such technology transfers are seen as inevitably bound by unilaterally defined relationships (Nochteff, 1988).…”
Section: Innovation and Competitive Advantagementioning
confidence: 99%