Advances in Measurement Systems 2010
DOI: 10.5772/8732
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Inductive Telemetric Measurement Systems for Remote Sensing

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 16 publications
(16 reference statements)
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The simulation using software Multisim 11.0 (National Instruments Inc.) about the resonant frequency of device is 24.3 MHz (shown in Figure 9) that is 9.5 percent higher than the measured data 22.2 MHz at 0 bar. The simulation model is shown in Figure 10 that is a simplified equivalent circuit without consideration of the parasitic capacitance (Marioli et al, 2010). The discrepancy between the predicated and measured resonant frequency might be attributed to the initial predeflection that existed during fabrication, so the gap between the upper and lower membranes is smaller than designed one, and that may be the reason of resonant frequency decrease.…”
Section: Figure 3 Typical Impedance Phase Diagramsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The simulation using software Multisim 11.0 (National Instruments Inc.) about the resonant frequency of device is 24.3 MHz (shown in Figure 9) that is 9.5 percent higher than the measured data 22.2 MHz at 0 bar. The simulation model is shown in Figure 10 that is a simplified equivalent circuit without consideration of the parasitic capacitance (Marioli et al, 2010). The discrepancy between the predicated and measured resonant frequency might be attributed to the initial predeflection that existed during fabrication, so the gap between the upper and lower membranes is smaller than designed one, and that may be the reason of resonant frequency decrease.…”
Section: Figure 3 Typical Impedance Phase Diagramsmentioning
confidence: 99%