1991
DOI: 10.1016/0022-0248(91)90273-8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Induction time and metastability limit in new phase formation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

5
217
0
4

Year Published

2009
2009
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 199 publications
(226 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
5
217
0
4
Order By: Relevance
“…Therefore, the phenomenon that protein molecules crystallized with a longer time in a smaller solution volume indicated that the probability for nucleation became smaller in reduced volumes. These results agree with the previous studies that the nucleation in the protein crystallization process can be controlled by changing the volume of protein solutions [64][65][66][67]. …”
Section: Volume Effect On Protein Crystallizationsupporting
confidence: 93%
“…Therefore, the phenomenon that protein molecules crystallized with a longer time in a smaller solution volume indicated that the probability for nucleation became smaller in reduced volumes. These results agree with the previous studies that the nucleation in the protein crystallization process can be controlled by changing the volume of protein solutions [64][65][66][67]. …”
Section: Volume Effect On Protein Crystallizationsupporting
confidence: 93%
“…Consequently, there are various definitions of the induction time in view of different experimental methods (Kashchiev, 2000;Kashchiev et al, 1991;Natarajan et al, 1994;Natarajan, 1993;Kashchiev and Firoozabadi, 2002a;So¨hnel and Mullin, 1988;Christiansen and Sloan, 1995).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The values of J(T) can be measured by repeated experimental freezing studies. 163,181,182 Finally, to obtainτ i (T ), the definition suggested by Kaschiev 183 is adopted…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%