The platform will undergo maintenance on Sep 14 at about 7:45 AM EST and will be unavailable for approximately 2 hours.
2018
DOI: 10.5935/0004-2749.20180075
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Induction of pluripotent stem cells by reprogramming human ocular fibroblasts under xeno-free conditions

Abstract: Sendai virus facilitates induced pluripotent stem cell reprogramming of ocular fibroblasts-both human pterygium and human Tenon's capsule fibroblasts being safe and efficient for induced pluripotent stem cell reprogramming. Although the reprogramming efficiencies of ocular-derived induced pluripotent stem cells under xeno-free conditions were not superior to those observed using the traditional reprogramming system, the cell therapy system reprogramming system is a good option when induced pluripotent stem cel… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

1
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…As in previous studies, we have developed an optimized system for derivation of 3D retinal tissue. Stem-cell-derived retinal organoids are seeded on poly­(lactic- co -glycolic acid) (PLGA) scaffolds and directed toward retinal ganglion cell (RGC) fate. In the present study, we synthesized the CNT-PLGA scaffolds by electrospinning technology and assessed their conductivity, biocompatibility, and degradation.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As in previous studies, we have developed an optimized system for derivation of 3D retinal tissue. Stem-cell-derived retinal organoids are seeded on poly­(lactic- co -glycolic acid) (PLGA) scaffolds and directed toward retinal ganglion cell (RGC) fate. In the present study, we synthesized the CNT-PLGA scaffolds by electrospinning technology and assessed their conductivity, biocompatibility, and degradation.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, the lower reprogramming efficiency and especially potential safety issues such as insertional mutagenesis of genome, unpredictable genetic dysfunction, and tumorigenicity limit the clinical applications of iPSCs. New methodological modifications such as reducing the number of defined factors, using non-integrating virus vector (such as adenovirus) (Ye and Wang 2018), excisable vector (such as piggyBac) (Rodriguez-Polo et al 2019), or non-viral vector (such as transposon system) (Kues et al 2013), establishing xeno-free conditions (Xiong et al 2018), and developing non-DNA inducers such as synthetic mRNA (McGrath et al 2018), self-replicating RNA (srRNA) (Steinle et al 2019), microRNA (miRNA) (Kogut et al 2018), small molecule (Ma et al 2017), or recombinant protein were developed to weaken or overcome these drawbacks. As a novel, nucleic acid-free, and non-integrating strategy, recombinant protein-mediated reprogramming can effectively eliminate any risks of insertional mutagenesis and provide a substantially simpler, faster, and safer approach to generate iPSCs.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%