1988
DOI: 10.2337/diab.37.2.204
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Induction of Insulitis by Adoptive Transfer With L3T4+ Lyt2− T-Lymphocytes in T-Lymphocyte–Depleted NOD Mice

Abstract: To clarify the pathogenesis of insulitis in the nonobese diabetic (NOD) mouse, an animal model for human insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus, T-lymphocyte-depleted NOD mice (B mice) were adoptively transferred with spleen and lymph node cells from cyclophosphamide-treated NOD mice after separating the cells with monoclonal antibodies against various T-lymphocyte surface antigens plus complement. Light-microscopic and immunohistochemical studies were also performed to investigate the lymphocytic infiltrations. … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

1
6
0

Year Published

1989
1989
2006
2006

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 26 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
1
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…are consistent with the report of Shizuru et al (36), whose use of mAbs against the CD4 determinant prevented lymphocytic infiltration, eliminated destruction ofinsulinproducing a cells, and blocked IDDM in NOD mice (36). Similarly, several investigators have shown a selective role for CD4+ lymphocytes in the ability to transfer IDDM in NOD mice (37)(38)(39), while others noted a combined or accelerated role with CD4+ and CD8+ lymphocytes (22,40,41 The involvement of CD4+ cells in offsetting this genetic susceptibility to disease of LCMV infected NOD mice is not associated with generalized immunosuppression. Despite carrying LCMV and escaping from IDDM, these mice are nevertheless able to make immune responses to a wide variety of antigens all dependent on CD4 function .…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 90%
“…are consistent with the report of Shizuru et al (36), whose use of mAbs against the CD4 determinant prevented lymphocytic infiltration, eliminated destruction ofinsulinproducing a cells, and blocked IDDM in NOD mice (36). Similarly, several investigators have shown a selective role for CD4+ lymphocytes in the ability to transfer IDDM in NOD mice (37)(38)(39), while others noted a combined or accelerated role with CD4+ and CD8+ lymphocytes (22,40,41 The involvement of CD4+ cells in offsetting this genetic susceptibility to disease of LCMV infected NOD mice is not associated with generalized immunosuppression. Despite carrying LCMV and escaping from IDDM, these mice are nevertheless able to make immune responses to a wide variety of antigens all dependent on CD4 function .…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 90%
“…On the one hand, cloned islet-reactive NOD CD4 + T-cells have been shown to mediate rejection of islet cell grafts (3,4) and to transfer diabetes to NOD-scid/scid mice (5). In contrast, using freshly isolated uncloned T-cells, most groups report that both CD4 + and CD8 + T-cells are necessary to transfer diabetes and that CD4 + T-cells alone transfer only insulitis to recipients (6)(7)(8). We (7) and Bendelac et al (8) proposed an interaction between the two subsets of cells in which CD4 + cells were involved in the homing and activation of CD8 + islet-reactive cells, the physiologically relevant effectors of p-cell destruction.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In combinations with only class I MHC disparity, the former two Th cell subsets are activated to recognize allo class I MHC antigens, although predominatly allo class I MHC-restricted CD8+ Th cells function in the B6-bml combination where class I disparity is generated by a simple mutation in a class I MHC gene (16,18) . In addition to this classical CD8+ CTIrinvolved pathway, it is likely that tissue destruction/graft rejection in transplantation immunity, as well as tumor immunity and autoimmunity, is also induced by an alternate immune pathway(s) (28)(29)(30)(31)(32)(33)(34)(35)(36) . The cellular and molecular mechanisms involved in such pathway(s) remain to be determined.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%