1974
DOI: 10.1210/endo-95-3-793
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Induction of Chronic Growth Hormone Deficiency by Anti-GH Serum

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

3
2
0

Year Published

1978
1978
1998
1998

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
3
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The inhi¬ bition of growth continued after cessation of anti-(rGH) treatment, also became apparent within 24 h of cessation of GH treatment in anti-(rGH)-treated rats which received concurrent oGH injections and was still evident 4 weeks after commencing treatment. The effects on pup growth are similar to those previously reported by Grindeland, Smith, Evans & Ellis (1974) although they attributed the suppression of growth during the first 21 days of treatment to a non-specific effect of serum and they did not find any decrease in serum GH. Our results, in which GH injections over¬ came the effects of anti-(rGH), however, clearly show them to be due specifically to neutralization of GH.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 88%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The inhi¬ bition of growth continued after cessation of anti-(rGH) treatment, also became apparent within 24 h of cessation of GH treatment in anti-(rGH)-treated rats which received concurrent oGH injections and was still evident 4 weeks after commencing treatment. The effects on pup growth are similar to those previously reported by Grindeland, Smith, Evans & Ellis (1974) although they attributed the suppression of growth during the first 21 days of treatment to a non-specific effect of serum and they did not find any decrease in serum GH. Our results, in which GH injections over¬ came the effects of anti-(rGH), however, clearly show them to be due specifically to neutralization of GH.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 88%
“…Pituitary weight during the first 14 days was reduced by a mean value of 37% and GH content 45% compared with a 20% reduction in body weight, suggesting a specific effect on the pituitary. Similar findings were reported by Grindeland et al (1974). Within the pituitary gland itself GH concentration was reduced whilst prolactin concentration was increased, although neither of these changes achieved statistical significance.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 85%
“…The results of this study confirm and extend the findings of our previous study (Flint & Gardner, 1989) as well as those of others (Grindeland, Smith, Evans & Ellis, 1974;Ellis, Vodian & Grindeland, 1978), and demonstrate that a specific antiserum to rGH can produce reductions in body weight gain and serum IGF-I lasting more than 6 weeks. How this effect is produced is unclear since circulating con¬ centrations of antibodies would not be expected to remain sufficiently potent for this length of time due to their neutralization in 7-10 days by rat antibodies against the sheep -globulin injected.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
“…Several lines of evidence demonstrate that the tibial growth, as used in the present bioassay, is not a measure of iGH. First, tibial growth was not inhibited by systemic administration of antibodies engendered to 22-kDa pituitary GH, the antibodies used to measure iGH; this indicates that the influence of 22-kDa GH on the bioassay is minimal (9,11,15). Second, basal levels of plasma iGH in the rat…”
Section: Source and Type Of Afferents That Can Regulate Bghmentioning
confidence: 99%