Neonatal female rats were treated for 3 weeks (short term) or 8 weeks (long term) with antiserum to rat GH (anti-rGH) with or without replacement therapy with recombinant bovine GH (bGH). Body weight gain and tail length were significantly suppressed within the first 3 weeks and were even more markedly suppressed when treatment was continued for 8 weeks. When treatment was stopped in short-term-treated animals the rate of body weight gain recovered, although without evidence of catch-up growth. These effects were all normalized by concurrent treatment with bGH. Long-term anti-rGH treatment caused a profound reduction (80%) in the number of differentiated adipocytes in two internal fat depots, whilst the subcutaneous depot was only moderately affected (20%). In contrast, after recovery from short-term treatment with anti-rGH, the internal depots were only marginally decreased in both weight and adipocyte numbers, whereas the subcutaneous depot was actually doubled in size compared with controls, due entirely to an increase in the number of differentiated adipocytes. These data clearly demonstrate for the first time that GH is required for the differentiation of adipocytes in vivo. In addition, the results demonstrate distinct effects at different anatomical sites and suggest that GH may be one factor responsible for the differences described in numerous metabolic parameters and hormonal sensitivities of adipose tissue derived from different locations within the body.
Treatment of rats for 24 h on day 2, 10 or 20 of age with a specific antiserum to rGH (anti-(rGH], GH, bromocriptine (CB-154) or prolactin failed to influence body weight gain or serum concentrations of insulin-like growth factor-I (IGF-I). On day 28 of age, however, anti-(rGH) completely inhibited body weight gain and markedly reduced circulating IGF-I concentrations, effects which were completely prevented by exogenous ovine GH (oGH). When administered to control rats on day 28 oGH caused supranormal weight gain and serum IGF-I concentrations. These results suggested that GH does not play a significant role in growth or regulation of serum IGF-I until after day 20 of age. By contrast, when anti-(rGH) was given for 4 consecutive days beginning on day 2 of life, body weight gain was reduced within 48 h and remained so until at least 28 days of age. Tail length was also significantly reduced. The effect was due to inhibition of GH effects since serum GH concentrations were low and exogenous GH prevented the effect. Inhibition of growth during the first 14 days of life occurred in the absence of any effect on serum IGF-I although by 21 days of age serum IGF-I was considerably lower than in control rats. The prolonged reduction in growth after treatment has stopped appeared to be due to a cytotoxic effect on the pituitary gland since pituitary weight and GH but not prolactin content were significantly decreased.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)
Both PRL and GH play a role in maintaining lactation in the rat, although GH can only maintain pup weight gain at around 50% of the control value, whereas PRL can maintain weight gain close to 90% in the absence of GH. In this study we examined the effects of PRL and GH deficiency (using bromocriptine and an antiserum to rat GH) on milk yield and composition in lactating rats. Treatment with bromocriptine to suppress PRL secretion for 48 h led to a 57% decrease in milk yield with a concomitant decrease in milk protein and lactose yields, but no decrease in fat output. This led to the production of milk with a lower lactose concentration but increased concentrations of protein and particularly fat (increased 100%), which suggests that GH serves an auxiliary role by maintaining an energy-rich milk for the neonate when PRL secretion is reduced. This decrease in milk synthesis was accompanied by decreases in total mammary DNA content and increased milk sodium concentrations. The latter indicates the opening of tight junctions between mammary epithelial cells, which normally occurs during dedifferentiation and involution of the mammary gland. This suggests that PRL maintains milk synthesis at least in part by inhibiting epithelial cell loss and maintaining cellular differentiation. A deficiency in GH, by contrast, caused only a small decrease (24%) in milk yield and had no effect on the major constituents of milk or on milk sodium concentrations or total mammary DNA content. When animals were made deficient in both PRL and GH, however, there was a further marked decrease (88%) in milk volume along with the yields of all major milk constituents, confirming our previous findings that PRL and GH are the major regulators of milk synthesis. Recent studies have indicated that GH exerts direct effects on mammary gland growth, but its actions on milk secretion have been proposed to be mediated indirectly via insulin-like growth factor-I (IGF-I). We, therefore, inhibited lactation by inducing PRL and GH deficiency for 48 h and then attempted to reinitiate it by administering GH either systemically or by local oil-based implants into the mammary gland. Oil-based GH implants were as effective in stimulating milk secretion in the treated (but not contralateral, control) gland as was systemic GH treatment. Thus, GH does act directly on the mammary gland to stimulate milk synthesis, although this does not rule out the possibility that GH acts by stimulating local production of IGF-I.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)
Anti-idiotypic antibodies to rat GH antibodies were produced in both sheep and mice and shown to be capable of mimicking GH by inhibiting 125I-labelled ovine GH (oGH) binding to sheep liver membranes. The sheep anti-idiotypes were characterized further and shown to (1) inhibit 125I-labelled oGH binding to oGH antibodies, (2) inhibit 125I-labelled oGH binding to rat adipocytes and (3) be incapable of inhibiting the binding of either 125I-labelled ovine prolactin or 125I-labelled bovine insulin to sheep liver membranes. This indicated that the antibodies were not limited to certain species or tissues, but were hormone specific. Finally, these anti-idiotypic antibodies were also capable of stimulating an increase in body weight gain in hypophysectomized rats, suggesting that they may be functional as well as structural mimics of GH, although the increased body weight gain was not accompanied by any increase in circulating concentrations of insulin-like growth factor-I.
Lactation was suppressed in rats using a combined treatment of bromocriptine (to reduce prolactin concentrations) and a specific antiserum to rat GH administered twice daily for 2 days. When milk production had ceased, as determined by litter weight loss and the absence of milk in the stomachs of pups, attempts were made to reinitiate lactation using prolactin, GH, insulin-like growth factor-I (IGF-I) precomplexed to recombinant human IGF-binding protein-3 (hIGFBP-3) or IGF-I plus IGF-II precomplexed to hIGFBP-3. Despite the fact that all treatments except prolactin led to increases in serum IGFs and IGFBP-3, only prolactin and GH provoked the reinitiation of milk production as determined by increased litter weight gain, milk in the stomach of pups and a significant increase in the weight of the mammary glands. Since the mammary gland has been shown to produce IGFBPs which may inhibit IGF action we also tested three IGF-I analogues, R3-IGF-I, Long-IGF-I and Long-R3-IGF-I. R3-IGF-I has a single amino acid substitution (Glu to Arg) at position 3 whereas Long-IGF-I has a 13 amino acid N-terminal extension. These modifications dramatically reduce the ability of these analogues to bind to IGFBPs although they remain active at the IGF-I receptor. Such IGF analogues would therefore be expected to be active irrespective of the production of inhibitory IGFBPs. However, none was effective in reinitiating lactation, even at doses which have been shown to be biologically effective in terms of nitrogen retention.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
hi@scite.ai
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.