2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.cej.2021.133380
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Induction heating as an alternative electrified heating method for carbon capture process

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
25
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 28 publications
(26 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
1
25
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This trend was found to be consistent with a previously reported study by Denayer and co-workers. 11 Initially, the heating from the induction was approximate to that of the conventional at a rate of 3.2, 5.7, and 14.2 °C/min for the 10, 15, and 20 wt % composites, respectively, but later, it took much longer for the materials to reach a maximum temperature under the induction heating. The lower heating rate in the 10 and 15 wt % monoliths can be attributed to lower loading of the Fe 2 O 3 particles, which reduced sufficient contact with the zeolite 13X particles for efficient heat conduction, thereby causing the decrease in heating rate.…”
Section: Effect Of Monolith Compositionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…This trend was found to be consistent with a previously reported study by Denayer and co-workers. 11 Initially, the heating from the induction was approximate to that of the conventional at a rate of 3.2, 5.7, and 14.2 °C/min for the 10, 15, and 20 wt % composites, respectively, but later, it took much longer for the materials to reach a maximum temperature under the induction heating. The lower heating rate in the 10 and 15 wt % monoliths can be attributed to lower loading of the Fe 2 O 3 particles, which reduced sufficient contact with the zeolite 13X particles for efficient heat conduction, thereby causing the decrease in heating rate.…”
Section: Effect Of Monolith Compositionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The main technologies considered for biogas upgrading include absorption via amine scrubbing and pressurized water scrubbing, adsorption via pressure swing adsorption (PSA), and membrane via gas permeation. 8−10 Adsorption-based separation has the potential to adopt nonthermal practices for regeneration of sorbents such as electric swing adsorption (ESA), 9 magnetic induction swing adsorption (MISA), 11,12 or microwave swing adsorption (MSA). 13 In particular, magnetic responsiveness is a valuable characteristic that can be exploited to address the problem of high-energy requirements of separation processes, as magnetic fieldinduced heating can be used for desorption, with the heat generated homogeneously through the material due to localized nanoheaters, and thus is preferred for the adsorbents with low thermal conductivity where the heating time can be greatly reduced.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…99 Meanwhile, alternative heating methods are important to consider, such as microwave heating, Joule heating, and induction heating. 67,[100][101][102][103][104] These can also help to electrify the process and reduce the requirement for additional equipment to convert electricity into heat, like heat pumps.…”
Section: Implications For Process and Contactor Optimisationmentioning
confidence: 99%