1995
DOI: 10.1016/0042-6989(94)00235-e
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Inducing ametropias in hatchling chicks by defocus—Aperture effects and cylindrical lenses

Abstract: Light-weight translucent plastic goggles with convex or concave rigid contact lens inserts were applied unilaterally to the eyes of young chicks. Convex and concave cylindrical lenses produced astigmatic refractive errors. The magnitude of the induced astigmatism was less than that of the inducing lens and varied with axis orientation. Decreased aperture size or interruption of the defocus resulted in a decreased response to refractive defocus. Slit apertures and spherical defocus produced variable amounts of … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
56
2

Year Published

1996
1996
2013
2013

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 74 publications
(58 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
0
56
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Some animal studies have assessed the effect of applying cylindrical lenses to the central retina of developing animals and produced mixed results. Irving et al 47 found evidence for a partial compensatory astigmatic growth in chick eyes; the effectiveness of the compensation varied with the orientation of the axis of the cylinder. In contrast, Schmid and Wildsoet 48 found no astigmatic compensation in the growing chick eye: rather chicks appeared to ''emmetropize'' to the meridian with the greater myopic defocus, irrespective of the cylinder axis.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Some animal studies have assessed the effect of applying cylindrical lenses to the central retina of developing animals and produced mixed results. Irving et al 47 found evidence for a partial compensatory astigmatic growth in chick eyes; the effectiveness of the compensation varied with the orientation of the axis of the cylinder. In contrast, Schmid and Wildsoet 48 found no astigmatic compensation in the growing chick eye: rather chicks appeared to ''emmetropize'' to the meridian with the greater myopic defocus, irrespective of the cylinder axis.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…111 Plus lenses have been shown to act inversely to decrease the AL elongation rate in tree shrews 112 and chicks. 113 The idea of recovery from induced myopia emerged when it was reported that induced chick axial elongation due to form deprivation showed recovery when patterned light was restored in young animals. 114 These researchers also suggested that this recovery is inversely related to age and hinted at the existence of an active emmetropization mechanism.…”
Section: Animal Model Studies Related To Myopia and Eye Growthmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moreover, optically imposing either myopia or hyperopia in young animals with spherical lenses results in compensating axial ametropias that are dependent on the sign and power of the treatment lenses (e.g., rhesus monkeys,24 marmosets,25 tree shrews, 26 and chickens27). However, in part because experimentally induced refractive errors have traditionally been expressed in a spherical-equivalent format (i.e., the averaged correction for the two principal astigmatic meridians), only a few studies in chickens have previously noted an association between astigmatism and either axial hyperopia or myopia.28, 29 The purpose of this study was to determine if vision-dependent alterations in axial growth also lead to the development of astigmatism in primates. Specifically, we examined the frequency and characteristics of astigmatism in infant monkeys that developed axial ametropias in response to a variety of different types of altered visual experience.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%