2009
DOI: 10.1007/s11703-009-0086-y
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Induced morphological mutants in soybean [Glycine max (L.) Merrill]

Abstract: The seeds of two soybean cultivars viz., Pusa-16 and PK-1042 were treated with 15, 30, and 45 kR of gamma rays, three concentrations of ethyl methane sulphonate (EMS) (0.1%, 0.2%, and 0.3%), and their combinations. Various morphological mutants were recorded in M 2 and M 3 generations. These morphological mutants were named on the basis of the part of the plant body affected. Eight different morphological mutants, i.e., tall, dwarf, gigas, black pod, smooth pod, black spotted seed, bold seeded, and early matur… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
11
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
3
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The higher efficiencies of the lower and moderate concentrations of mutagens were clearly due to the lower biological damage (seedling injury, pollen sterility and meiotic abnormalities) which increased with increase in the strength of the mutagen treatments. Similar observations of higher effectiveness and efficiency at the lower and moderate concentrations of mutagens were also made in Lathyrus sativus [23], Pisum sativum [24], Glycine max [25] and Vigna radiata [26].…”
Section: Mutagenic Effectiveness and Efficiencysupporting
confidence: 78%
“…The higher efficiencies of the lower and moderate concentrations of mutagens were clearly due to the lower biological damage (seedling injury, pollen sterility and meiotic abnormalities) which increased with increase in the strength of the mutagen treatments. Similar observations of higher effectiveness and efficiency at the lower and moderate concentrations of mutagens were also made in Lathyrus sativus [23], Pisum sativum [24], Glycine max [25] and Vigna radiata [26].…”
Section: Mutagenic Effectiveness and Efficiencysupporting
confidence: 78%
“…Similar results of high frequency and broad spectrum of induced morphological mutants by chemical mutagens were also reported in Vigna mungo (Arulbalachandran and Mullainathan, 2009;Goyal and Khan, 2010), Vicia faba L. (Laskar and Khan, 2014;Laskar et al, 2015), Lens culinaris (Tyagi and Gupta, 1991;Tripathi and Dubey, 1992;Solanki and Sharma, 1999;Amin et al, 2015), Cicer arietinum (Khan et al, 2004), Glycine max (Khan and Tyagi, 2010) and Cicer arietinum (Wani, 2011). Macromutations affecting growth habit, flower color and plant type have been reported in chickpea earlier (Ahmad and Godward, 1993;Kharkwal, 1999;Gaur and Gour, 2001;Khan et al, 2004;Wani, 2011).…”
Section: Effect On Plant Morphologysupporting
confidence: 64%
“…Davis et al (1985) isolated a chickpea mutant with enlarged leaves, pods, seeds and flowers after gamma irradiation of seeds. Wani (2007) and Khan and Tyagi (2010) have also reported gigas mutants in both mungbean and soybean. The highest frequency of morphological mutants was noted in the HZ treated populations (5.19%) and the lowest was with SA (1.39%) while MMS treatments (3.89%) were intermediate (Table 1).…”
Section: Gigas Mutantmentioning
confidence: 97%