2019
DOI: 10.1039/c8nr09148j
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Induced charge electro-osmotic particle separation

Abstract: We present a direct particle separation method based on induced charge electro-osmotic vortices in continuous flow.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
21
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 24 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
0
21
0
Order By: Relevance
“…ICEO flow is the nonlinear fluid electroosmosis that occurs when an applied electric field, either DC or AC, acts upon the ionic charge it induces around a polarizable surface [57,58]. This flow has thus far been mainly studied around the conducting surface of, for example, a metallic electrode or particle, either electrically activated or left floating [59][60][61][62][63][64][65][66][67]. It exhibits a quadratic dependence on the applied electric field and typically consists of a pair of counter-rotating vortices [68][69][70][71].…”
Section: Iceo Flowmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…ICEO flow is the nonlinear fluid electroosmosis that occurs when an applied electric field, either DC or AC, acts upon the ionic charge it induces around a polarizable surface [57,58]. This flow has thus far been mainly studied around the conducting surface of, for example, a metallic electrode or particle, either electrically activated or left floating [59][60][61][62][63][64][65][66][67]. It exhibits a quadratic dependence on the applied electric field and typically consists of a pair of counter-rotating vortices [68][69][70][71].…”
Section: Iceo Flowmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The use of a large amount of sheath fluid also significantly increases the operating cost. Other approaches mainly rely on the internally or externally imposed forces, such as inertial,[10] viscoelastic [11], electric [12], acoustic [13], and hybrid forces [14,15]. These approaches can accomplish good separation in many circumstances but may have potential drawbacks when the biological particles are handled.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Particle separation is an essential process prior to water quality analysis 1 , nanoscale exosomes isolation 2, 3 , early-stage cancer diagnosis 4 , uniform-size (microscale or nanoscale) graphene isolation 5,6 , the transesterification of microalgal lipids to biodiesel 7 and so on 8 . For such purposes, many effective methods of separation have been developed, including acoustic waves 4,9 , dielectrophoresis (DEP) [10][11][12] , magnetism 7,13 , optical field 14,15 , and centrifugation 16 . Although each method has its specific advantages, each is also limited by natural drawbacks.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Centrifugation may also achieve massive particle separation; the high-speed rotation makes it near impossible to integrate it with other platforms 16 . Furthermore, magnetism offers excellent performance in a separation device, but is only suitable for magnetic particles or particles able to be magnetically labelled 7,13 . Moreover, many DEP-based separation devices, aside from suffering the same issue as acoustic separation devices, are unable to avoid the adherent growth of cells or adhesion of particles on the electrodes 11 .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%