1998
DOI: 10.1007/s002990050519
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Induced androgenesis in tomato ( Lycopersicon esculentum Mill.)

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

2
29
0
7

Year Published

2008
2008
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 51 publications
(41 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
2
29
0
7
Order By: Relevance
“…As usual in most of the androgenic systems known to date, the genotype plays an important role. In particular, male-sterile mutant lines have been shown to be especially sensitive to induction (Zamir et al 1980;Zagorska et al 1998;Seguí-Simarro and Nuez 2007 On the one hand, this study confirmed that it is possible to induce androgenesis from meiocytes as long as they are in vitro cultured within the anthers, as previously shown Seguí-Simarro and Nuez 2005 environment, devoid of the protective and nutritive role of the zygotic endosperm. This is not surprising since embryos rescued from interspecific or intergeneric crosses frequently abort at different developmental stages due to disturbances in endosperm development (reviewed in Bhatia et al 2004).…”
Section: Androgenic Dhs In Tomatosupporting
confidence: 69%
“…As usual in most of the androgenic systems known to date, the genotype plays an important role. In particular, male-sterile mutant lines have been shown to be especially sensitive to induction (Zamir et al 1980;Zagorska et al 1998;Seguí-Simarro and Nuez 2007 On the one hand, this study confirmed that it is possible to induce androgenesis from meiocytes as long as they are in vitro cultured within the anthers, as previously shown Seguí-Simarro and Nuez 2005 environment, devoid of the protective and nutritive role of the zygotic endosperm. This is not surprising since embryos rescued from interspecific or intergeneric crosses frequently abort at different developmental stages due to disturbances in endosperm development (reviewed in Bhatia et al 2004).…”
Section: Androgenic Dhs In Tomatosupporting
confidence: 69%
“…As usual in most of the androgenic systems known to date, the genotype plays an important role. In particular, male-sterile mutant lines have been shown to be especially sensitive to induction (Zamir et al 1980;Zagorska et al 1998;Seguí-Simarro and Nuez 2007). It is noteworthy that male-sterile phenotypes are usually manifested at the late meiocyte stage, which in most cases overlap with the inductive window of tomato anther cultures.…”
Section: Androgenic Dhs In Tomatomentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Some calli did not respond to organogenesis, whereas others gave rise to more than one regenerant. Despite the fact that regenerants originating from the same callus may be clones, we decided to study the entire set of plants obtained, for the following reasons: (1) frequent mixoploidy in anther-derived calli is welldocumented (Seguí-Simarro andNuez 2005, 2007;Zagorska et al 1998Zagorska et al , 2004 and it implies the possibility of genetically different individuals originating from different regions of the same mixoploid callus; (2) all plants regenerated from a single callus may provide information about the regenerative capacity of the different tissues involved in the callus and plant production.…”
Section: Flow Cytometric Morphological and Molecular Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Different laboratories have reported induction of calli (Dao and Shamina 1978;Summers 1990, 1991;Sharp et al 1972) or embryo-like multicellular structures (Dao and Shamina 1978;Varghese and Gulshan 1986), and regeneration of roots (Gresshoff and Doy 1972;Gulshan and Sharma 1981;Levenko et al 1977;Sharp and Dougall 1971) or apical shoots (Ma et al 1999). Only two laboratories have published on the regeneration of entire plants with a clear haploid origin (Seguí-Simarro andNuez 2005, 2007;Zagorska et al 1998Zagorska et al , 2004, but also with a high percentage of mixoploid calli and at a low general efficiency of the process. At present, a detailed study about the causes of such a low efficiency and the impact of somatic tissues on the total of calli produced is still lacking.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation