Our system is currently under heavy load due to increased usage. We're actively working on upgrades to improve performance. Thank you for your patience.
2016 IEEE Global Communications Conference (GLOBECOM) 2016
DOI: 10.1109/glocom.2016.7841898
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Indoor and Outdoor 5G Diffraction Measurements and Models at 10, 20, and 26 GHz

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
47
0
3

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 66 publications
(52 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
1
47
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…Work in [75] shows that received power of wideband 73 GHz signals has a stationary mean over slight movements but average power can change by 25 dB as the mobile transitioned a building cornor from non-line-of-sight (NLOS) to LOS in an urban microcell (UMi) environment [88], [94]. Measurements at 10, 20 and 26 GHz demonstrate that diffraction loss can be predicted using well-known models as a mobile moves around a corner using directional antennas [95], and human body blockage causes more than 40 dB of fading [88], [94].…”
Section: G Antenna and Propagation Challengesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Work in [75] shows that received power of wideband 73 GHz signals has a stationary mean over slight movements but average power can change by 25 dB as the mobile transitioned a building cornor from non-line-of-sight (NLOS) to LOS in an urban microcell (UMi) environment [88], [94]. Measurements at 10, 20 and 26 GHz demonstrate that diffraction loss can be predicted using well-known models as a mobile moves around a corner using directional antennas [95], and human body blockage causes more than 40 dB of fading [88], [94].…”
Section: G Antenna and Propagation Challengesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The definitive challenge for a 5G channel model is to provide a fundamental physical basis, while being flexible, and accurate, especially across a wide frequency range such as 0.5 GHz to 100 GHz. Recently, a great deal of research aimed at understanding the propagation mechanisms and channel behavior at the frequencies above 6 GHz has been published [3], [4], [12]- [32], [40], [60], [73], [75], [78], [81], [83], [84], [89]- [95], [101]- [111]. The specific types of antennas used and numbers of measurements collected vary widely and may generally be found in the referenced work.…”
Section: Channel Modelingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…1. Based on (1) and (2), the diffraction power gain G(ν) in dB produced in a knife edge by the KED model is expressed as [17], [34]:…”
Section: ) Ked Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In order to facilitate the computation of G(α), a simple linear model (7) based on minimum mean squared error (MMSE) estimation between the model and measured data was proposed in [36] to estimate the diffraction loss caused by a curved surface at a single frequency, based on the creeping wave linear model [17], [32]:…”
Section: ) Ked Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These mechanisms have shown a substantial impact on mmWaves [45], [51], [145]. Due to the short wavelengths of mmWave signals, ranging between 1 mm and 10 mm, their propagation mechanisms are drastically different from those the sub-3 GHz, and hence have to be carefully studied and modeled to understand the mmWave channel.…”
Section: F Propagation Mechanismsmentioning
confidence: 99%