Indonesian EFL Learners’ Critical Thinking in Reading: Bridging the Gap between Declarative, Procedural and Conditional Knowledge

Abstract

Critical thinking is explicitly mentioned in many school and university curricula around the world including in the Indonesian education curriculum but it is rarely promoted inside the classrooms. Lack of agreement on its definition and clarity of instruction in the curriculum, the unfavourable culture and the teacher-centered teaching arguably prevent critical thinking to grow. Therefore, more research needs to be undertaken on students’ understanding of and engagement in critical thinking in reading. To fll the gap, this study was conducted, which aimed to investigate Indonesian learners’ critical thinking in reading. One research question was postulated, i.e., How critical are Indonesian EFL learners’ thinking in reading? To answer the question, a mixed method approach was undertaken. The participants of this study were 55 semesters four students enrolled in two classes of Critical Reading and Writing II (CRW2) of the English Education Study Program, Sanata Dharma University, Yogyakarta in the even semester of 2014. The instruments employed were a Likert-scale questionnaire and students’ reflections. Results from both quantitative and qualitative data analyses suggest that most of the students had sufficient declarative knowledge of critical thinking in reading. However, their procedural and conditional knowledge about critical thinking in reading were insufficient. Overall, students indicated some level of critical thinking in reading, but to become critical, they need to be in a learning environment where their critical thinking in reading could be regularly and intensively nurtured. The findings of the research are expected to inform English teachers, lecturers and researchers in Indonesia and other parts of the world about the importance of designing and carrying out the teaching-learning processes that can enhance learners’ declarative, procedural and conditional knowledge about critical thinking in reading.

Learning from Debaters: Insights Into Their Learning Strategies

“…All debaters habituate themselves to read articles from various sources in order to expose themselves to different points of views. It is in line with Indah & Kusuma (2016) and Mbato (2019) stated that to enhance critical thinking, one should be aware of the importance of reading habit, time management and exploring sources from internet. They prefer to browse the information on the internet as it offers up-to-date information of the world's most recent issue.…”

Efl undergraduate students’ self-regulation in thesis writing: help-seeking and motivation-regulation

“…This research was conducted at the undergraduate English Education Study Program of Sanata Dharma University, Indonesia. It is important to note that in Indonesia, the teacher-centered education practices are still prevalent inside the classrooms despite the recent government efforts to promote the school and university curriculum that give prominence to student-centered learning (see Dardjowidjojo, 2001;Indah, 2017;Indah & Kusuma, 2016;Liando, 2010, p. 119;Marcellino, 2008;Author, 2019). Sanata Dharma University, however, has been implementing student-centered learning (Universitas Sanata Dharma, 2009) where a great emphasis is put on students" development of knowledge and skills, commitment to seeking the truth, and being open to receiving and providing help for others.…”

Confronting Cultural Barriers in Public Speaking through Multiple Learning Strategies: A Case of Indonesian EFL Learners

“…Therefore, rather than merely focusing on standardized testing, university learning should be designed to support learners to learn from assessments (cf. Abdolrezapour, Tavakoli & Ketabi, 2017;Khonbi & Sadeghi, 2013;Mbato, 2013;Mbato, 2019). In this case, students needed more training to learn from self-assessments rather than relying more on external assessments, and their individual ability to regulate the learning environments (cf.…”

“…Metacognitively, good learning will happen when learners monitor and evaluate their performances, and plan the strategies to fix the learning problems and improve the learning outcome (cf. Oxford, 1990;Chamot, 2009a;2009b;Mbato, 2013;Mbato 2019).…”